خانه » مقالات » فصل چهاردهم: شمول افراد دارای ناتوانی ذهنی در حوزﮤ دیجیتال
فصل چهاردهم: شمول افراد دارای ناتوانی ذهنی در حوزﮤ دیجیتال
سه شنبه, ۰۱ مهر ۱۴۰۴
زمان تقریبی مطالعه ۳۳ دقیقه

کتاب‌نامه

  1. Able to Include. (2017, March). Making digital inclusion possible. Retrieved from https://ableto- include.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Able-to-include-Final-newsletter.pdf
  2. Bakardjieva, M., & Smith, R. (2001). The Internet in everyday life: Computer networking from the standpoint of the domestic user. New Media & Society 3(1), 67–83.
  3. Bannon, S., McGlynn, T., McKenzie, K., & Quayle, E. (2015). The Internet and young people with Additional Support Needs (ASN): Risk and safety. Computers in Human Behavior 53, 495–503.
  4. Bowker, N., & Tuffin, K. (2002). Disability discourses for online identities. Disability & Society 17(3), 327–344.
  5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by design and nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  6. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1999). Environments in developmental perspective: Theoretical and operational models. In S. L. Friedman & T. D. Wachs (Eds.), Measuring environment across the life span: Emerging methods and concepts (pp. 37–43). Washington, DC: APA Publishing.
  7. Buijs, P., Boot, E., Shugar, A., Fung, W. L. A., & Bassett, A. S. (2017). Internet safety issues for adolescents and adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 30(2), 416–418.
  8. Carey, A. C., Friedman, M. G., & Bryen, D. N. (2005). Use of electronic technologies by people with intellectual disabilities. Mental Retardation 43(5), 322–333.
  9. Caton, S., & Chapman, M. (2016). The use of social media and people with intellectual disability: A systematic review and thematic analysis. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 41(2), 125–139.
  10. Caton, S., Chapman, M., Hynan, A., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2013). The Use of Digital Technology by People with Learning Disabilities/Difficulties: Report from a Workshop Held on 26th March 2013. MMU, unpublished.
  11. Chadwick, D. D., (2018). Experiences of People with an Intellectual Disability of Risk, Restriction and Resilience Online. 5th IASSIDD Europe Congress Diversity & Belonging: Celebrating Difference. Athens, Greece,17th – 20th July, 2018.
  12. Chadwick, D. D., & Fullwood, C. (2018). An online life like any other: Identity, self-determination and social networking among adults with intellectual disabilities. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour & Social Networking 21(1), 56–64.
  13. Chadwick, D. D., Quinn, S., & Fullwood, C. (2017). Perceptions of the risks and benefits of Internet access and use by people with intellectual disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 45(1), 21–31.
  14. Chadwick, D. D., & Wesson, C. (2016). Digital inclusion and disability. In A. Attrill & C. Fullwood (Eds.), Applied Cyberpsychology (pp. 1–23). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  15. Chadwick, D. D., Wesson, C., & Fullwood, C. (2013). Internet access by people with intellectual disabilities: Inequalities and opportunities. Future Internet 5(3), 376–397.
  16. Chiner, E., G َ mez-Puerta, M., & Cardona-Molt َ, M. C. (2017). Internet use, risks and online behaviour: The view of Internet users with intellectual disabilities and their caregivers. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 45(3), 190–197.
  17. Cromby, J., & Standen, P. (1999). Cyborgs and stigma: technology, disability, subjectivity. In A. J. Gordo-Lopez & I. Parker (Eds.), Cyberpsychology (pp. 95–112). New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
  18. Didden, R., Scholte, R. H. J., Korzilius, H., DeMoor, J. M. H., Vermeulen, A., O’Reilly, M.,… Lancioni, G. E. (2009). Cyberbullying along students with intellectual and developmental disability in special education settings. Developmental Neurorehabilitation 12, 146–151.
  19. DiMaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2001). From the “digital divide” to “digital inequality”: Studying Internet use as penetration increases. Working Paper Series No. 15. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies.
  20. Dowse, L. (2001). Contesting practices, challenging codes: Self-advocacy, disability politics and the social model. Disability & Society 16(1), 123–141.
  21. Emerson, E., Mallam, S., Davies, I., & Spencer, K. (2005, September 28). Adults with learning disabilities in England 2003/4. Survey Report. Rotherham: NHS Health and Social Care Information Centre/Office for National Statistics.
  22. Emerson, E., & McVilly, K. (2004). Friendship activities of adults with intellectual disabilities in supported accommodation in Northern England. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 17(3), 191–197.
  23. Forrester-Jones, R., Carpenter, J., Coolen-Schrijner, P., Cambridge, P., Tate, A., Beecham, J.,… Wooff, D. (2006). The social networks of people with intellectual disability living in thecommunity 12 years after resettlement from long-stay hospitals. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 19(4), 285–295.
  24. Foundation for People with Learning Disabilities. (2014). Staying safe on social media and online. London. Retrieved from https://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/sites/default/files/stayingsafe- online.pdf
  25. Fox, S. (2011, January 21). Americans living with disability and their technology profile. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from https://www.pewinternet.org/2011/01/21/americans-living-with-disability-and-their-technologyprofile/
  26. Geniets, A., & Eynon, R. (2012, August 16). On the Periphery? Understanding Low and Discontinued Internet Use Amongst Young People in Britain. Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, UK. Retrieved from https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/archive/downloads/ publications/Lapsed_Internet_Users_Report_2012.pdf
  27. Gravell, C. (2012, May 17). Loneliness and cruelty: People with learning disabilities and their experience of harassment, abuse and related crime in the community. Report. London: Lemos and Crane.
  28. Goggin, G., & Newell, C. (2003). Digital Disability: The social construction of disability in new media. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
  29. Guo, B., Bricout, J. C., & Huang, J. (2005). A common open space or a digital divide? A social model perspective on the online disability community in China. Disability & Society 20(1),49–66.
  30. Gutiérrez, P., & Martorell Zargoza, A. (2011). People with intellectual disability and ICTs. Revista Comunicar 18(36), 173–180.
  31. Haddon, L. (2005). Personal information culture: The contribution of research on ICTs in everyday life. UNESCO between two phases of the world summit on the information society. 17–20 May, St. Petersburg, Russia.
  32. Hegarty, J. R., & Aspinall, A. (2006). The use of personal computers with adults who have developmental disability: Outcomes of an organisation-wide initiative. The British Journal of Development Disabilities 52(103), 137–154.
  33. Helsper, E. J. (2012). A corresponding fields model for the links between social and digital exclusion. Communication Theory 22(4), 403–426.
  34. Holmes, K. M., & O’Loughlin, N. (2012). The experiences of people with learning disabilities on social networking sites. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 42(1), 1–7.
  35. Hong, H., Yarosh, S., Kim, J. G., Abowd, G. D., & Arriaga, R. I. (2013). Investigating the use of circles in social networks to support independence of individuals with autism. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 3207–3216). 27 April–2 May, Paris, France. New York: ACM.
  36. Hoppestad, B. S. (2013). Current perspective regarding adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities accessing computer technology. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 8(3), 190–194.
  37. Jaeger, P. T. (2015). Disability, human rights, and social justice: The ongoing struggle for online accessibility and equality. First Monday 20(9).
  38. Jenaro, C., Flores, N., Cruz, M., Pérez, M. C., Vega, V., & Torres, V. A. (2017). Internet and cell phone usage patterns among young adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 31(2), 259–272.
  39. Johnson, R., & Hegarty, J. R. (2003). Websites as educational motivators for adults with learning disability. British Journal of Educational Technology 34(4), 479–486.
  40. Katz, E., Blumler, J., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In J. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communication: Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 19–34). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  41. Kennedy, H., Evans, S., & Thomas, S. (2010). Can the web be made accessible for people with intellectual disabilities? The Information Society 27(1), 29–39.
  42. Keskinen, T., Heimonen, T., Turunen, M., Rajaniemi, J. P., & Kauppinen, S. (2012). SymbolChat: A flexible picture-based communication platform for users with intellectual disabilities. Interacting with Computers 24(5), 374–386.
  43. Khan, R. F. (1985). Mental retardation and paternalistic control. In R. S. Laura & A. F. Ashman (Eds.), Moral issues in mental retardation. London: Croom Helm.
  44. Kydland, F., Molka-Danielsen, J., and Balandin, S. (2012). Examining the use of social media tool “Flickr” for impact on loneliness for people with intellectual disability. In Proceedings of the 2012 Norsk konferanse for organisasjoners bruk av informasjonsteknologi. (pp. 253–264). 19–21 November, Bodo, Norway. Trondheim: Akademika forlag.
  45. Li-Tsang, C. W., Lee, M. Y., Yeung, S. S., Siu, A. M., & Lam, C. S. (2007). A 6-month follow-up of the effects of an information and communication technology (ICT) training programme on people with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities 28(6), 559–566.
  46. Livingstone, S., & Haddon, L. (2009). EU kids online. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology 217(4), 236.
  47. Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., & Staksrud, E. (2015). Developing a framework for researching children’s online risks and opportunities in Europe. Retrieved on 28/08/18 from: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/64470/
  48. Lofgren-Mortenson, L. (2008). Love in cyberspace: Swedish young people with intellectual disabilities and the Internet 1. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 10(2), 125–138.
  49. Lofgren-Mortenson, L., Sorbring, E., & Molin, M. (2015). “T@ngled up in blue”: Views of parents and professionals on Internet use for sexual purposes among young people with intellectual disabilities. Sexuality and Disability 33(4), 533–544.
  50. Lough, E., & Fisher, M. H. (2016a). Parent and self-report ratings on the perceived levels of social vulnerability of adults with Williams syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 46(11), 3424–3433.
  51. Lough, E., & Fisher, M. H. (2016b). Internet use and online safety in adults with Williams syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 60(10), 1020–1030.
  52. Manion, M. L., & Bersani, H. A. (1987). Mental retardation as a Western sociological construct: A cross-cultural analysis. Disability, Handicap & Society 2(3), 231–245.
  53. Mazurek, M. O. (2013). Social media use among adults with autism spectrum disorders. Computers in Human Behavior 29(4), 1709–1714.
  54. McClimens, A., & Gordon, F. (2008). Presentation of self in e-veryday life: How people labeled with intellectual disability manage identity as they engage the blogosphere. Sociological Research Online 13(4), 1.
  55. McClimens, A., & Gordon, F. (2009). People with intellectual disabilities as bloggers: What’s social capital got to do with it anyway? Journal of Intellectual Disabilities 13(1), 19–30.
  56. McMillan, S. J., & Morrison, M. (2006). Coming of age with the Internet: A qualitative exploration of how the Internet has become an integral part of young people’s lives. New Media & Society 8(1), 73–95.
  57. Molin, M., Sorbring, E., & L ِ fgren-M ه rtenson, L. (2015). Teachers’ and parents’ views on the Internet and social media usage by pupils with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities 19(1), 22–33.
  58. National Telecommunications and Information Administration and Economics and Statistics Administration. (2013). Exploring the Digital Nation: America’s Emerging Online Experience. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ report/2013/exploring-digital-nation-americas-emerging-online-experience
  59. Normand, C. L., & Sallafranque-St-Louis, F. (2016). Cybervictimization of young people with an intellectual or developmental disability: Risks specific to sexual solicitation. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 29(2), 99–110.
  60. Ofcom (2015, October 1). Disabled Consumers’ Use of Communication Services. Report. Retrieved from https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0028/81586/disabled_ consumers_use_of_communications_services.pdf
  61. Oliver, M. (2013). The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability & Society 28(7), 1024–1026.
  62. Parsons, S., Daniels, H., Porter, J., & Robertson, C. (2008). Resources, staff beliefs and organizational culture: Factors in the use of information and communication technology for adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 21, 19–33.
  63. Perske, R. (1972). The dignity of risk and the MR. Mental Retardation 10(1), 24
  64. Plichta, P. (2010). Ways of ICT usage among mildly intellectually disabled adolescents: Potential risks and advantages. In E. Dunkels, G-M. Franber, and C. Hallgren (Eds.), Youth culture and net culture: Online social practices (pp. 296–315). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  65. Robertson, J., Emerson, E., Gregory, N., Hatton, C., Kessissoglou, S., Hallam, A., & Linehan, C. (2001). Social networks of people with mental retardation in residential settings. Mental Retardation 39(3), 201–214.
  66. Ruggerio, T. E. (2000). Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century. Mass Communication and Society, 3(1), 3–37.
  67. Sallafranque-St-Louis, F., & Normand, C. L. (2017). From solitude to solicitation: How people with intellectual disability or autism spectrum disorder use the Internet [online]. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 11(1), Article 7. http:// dx.doi.org/10.5817/CP2017-1-7
  68. Seale, J. K. (2007). Strategies for supporting the online publishing activities of adults with learning difficulties. Disability & Society 22(2), 173–186.
  69. Seale, J. (2014). The role of supporters in facilitating the use of technologies by adolescents and adults with learning disabilities: A place for positive risk-taking? European Journal of Special Needs Education 29(2), 220–236.
  70. Seale, J., & Chadwick, D. (2017). How does risk mediate the ability of adolescents and adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities to live a normal life by using the Internet? [online] Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 11(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2017-1-2
  71. Seale, J., Nind, M., & Simmons, B. (2013). Transforming positive risk-taking practices: The possibilities of creativity and resilience in learning disability contexts. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 15(3), 233–248.
  72. Selwyn, N. (2006). Digital division or digital decision? A study of non-users and low-users of computers. Poetics 34(4–5), 273–292.
  73. Shakespeare, T. (2014). Disability rights and wrongs revisited. New York: Routledge. Shogren, K. A., Luckasson, R., & Schalock, R. L. (2014). The definition of “context” and its application in the field of intellectual disability. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 11(2), 109–116.
  74. Shpigelman, C. N., Reiter, S., & Weiss, P. L. (2008). E-mentoring for youth with special needs: Preliminary results. CyberPsychology & Behavior 11(2), 196–200.
  75. Shpigelman, C. N., & Gill, C. J. (2014). How do adults with intellectual disabilities use Facebook? Disability & Society 29(10), 1601–1616.
  76. SpeakUp Rotherham. Healthy Surfers project. Retrieved from http://www.speakup.org. uk/?page_id=249
  77. Steinfield, C., Ellison, N. B., & Lampe, C. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 29(6), 434–445.
  78. Stendal, K., & Balandin, S. (2015). Virtual worlds for people with autism spectrum disorder: A case study in second life. Disability and Rehabilitation 37(17), 1591–1598.
  79. Thompson, J. R., Bradley, V. J., Buntinx, W. H. E., Schalock, R. L., Shogren, K. A., & Snell, M. E. (2009). Conceptualizing supports and the support needs of people with intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 47(2), 135–146. https://doi. org/10.1352/1934-9556-47.2.135
  80. UN General Assembly. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Retrieved from: http://www.un.org/disabilities.
  81. Van Dijk, J. A. (2017). Digital Divide: Impact of Access. The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects. [online]. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved from https://doi.org/ 10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0043
  82. Van Loon, J., Claes, C., Vandevelde, S., Van Hove, G., & Schalock, R. L. (2010). Assessing individual support needs to enhance personal outcomes. Exceptionality 18(4), 193–202.
  83. Verdegem, P., & Verhoest, P. (2009). Profiling the non-user: Rethinking policy initiatives stimulating ICT acceptance. Telecommunications Policy 33(10), 642–652.
  84. Watling, S. (2011). Digital exclusion: Coming out from behind closed doors. Disability & Society 26(4), 491–495.
  85. Wehmeyer, M. L., Smith, S. J., Palmer, S. B., & Davies, D. K. (2004). The effect of studentdirected transition planning with a computer-based reading support program on the selfdetermination of students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology 19(4), 7–22.
  86. World Health Organization (1992). International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision. Geneva: WHO.
  87. Williamson, K., Schauder, D., Stockfield, L., Wright, S., & Bow, A. (2001). The role of the Internet for people with disabilities: Issues of access and equity for public libraries. The Australian Library Journal 50(2), 157–174.
  88. Wong, A. W., Chan, C. C., Li-Tsang, C. W., & Lam, C. S. (2009). Competence of people with intellectual disabilities on using human–computer interface. Research in Developmental Disabilities 30(1), 107–123.
  89. Wright, M. F. (2017). Parental mediation, cyber victimization, adjustment difficulties, and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 11(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2017-1-6

Zisimopoulos, D., Sigafoos, J., & Koutromanos, G. (2011). Using video prompting and constant time delay to teach an Internet search basic skill to students with intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities 46(2), 238–250.

سایر مقالات
ردپای پنهان؛ تصاویر هوش مصنوعی دنیای جدید را خلق می‌کنند
چهار شنبه, ۲۶ آذر ۱۴۰۴
ویژگی‌های توسعه دولت دیجیتال
سه شنبه, ۰۴ خرداد ۱۴۰۰
تحول سیستم مالیاتی در اقتصاد دیجیتال
دوشنبه, ۱۵ دی ۱۳۹۹
«داده» به‌مثابهٔ طلای جدید
سه شنبه, ۰۶ تیر ۱۴۰۲