خانه » مقالات » فصل بیست‌وششم: بازی‌های ویدیویی و تغییر رفتار
فصل بیست‌وششم: بازی‌های ویدیویی و تغییر رفتار
چهار شنبه, ۰۲ مهر ۱۴۰۴
زمان تقریبی مطالعه ۴۱ دقیقه

بخش هفتم: گیمینگ

کتاب‌نامه

  1. Ahn, S. J. (2015). Incorporating immersive virtual environments in health promotion campaigns: A construal-level theory approach. Health Communication, 30(6), 545–556.
  2. Ahn, S. J. (2018). Face & hair: Looks that change behaviors. In J. Banks (Ed.), Avatar, assembled: The social and technical anatomy of digital bodies. New York: Peter Lang.
  3. Ahn, S. J., Bailenson, J. N., & Park, D. (2014). Short-and long-term effects of embodied experiences in immersive virtual environments on environmental locus of control and behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 235–245.
  4. Ahn, S. J., Bostick, J., Ogle, E., Nowak, K., McGillicuddy, K., & Bailenson, J. N. (2016). Experiencing nature: Embodying animals in immersive virtual environments increases inclusion of nature in self and involvement with nature. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(6), 399–419.
  5. Ahn, S. J., & Fox, J. (2017). Immersive virtual environments, avatars, and agents for health. In R. Parrott (Ed). Encyclopedia of health and risk message design and processing. New York: Oxford University Press.
  6. Ahn, S. J., Johnsen, K., Robertson, T., Moore, J., Brown, S., Marable, A., & Basu, A. (2015). Using virtual pets to promote physical activity in children: An application of the youth physical activity promotion model. Journal of Health Communication, 20(7), 807–815.
  7. Ahn, S. J., Le, A. M. T., & Bailenson, J. N. (2013). The effect of embodied experiences in self-other merging, attitude, and helping behavior. Media Psychology, 16, 7–38.
  8. Arthur, K. W., Booth, K. S., & Ware, C. (1993). Evaluating 3d task performance for fish tank virtual worlds. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 11, 239–265.
  9. Bailey, R., Wise, K., & Bolis, P. (2009). How avatar customizability affects children’s arousal and subjective presence during junk food-sponsored online video games. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 277–283.
  10. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
  11. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.
  12. Baranowski, T., Abdelsamad, D., Baranowski, J., O’Connor, T. M., Thompson, D., Barnett, A.,… Chen, T. A. (2012). Impact of an active video game on healthy children’s physical activity. Pediatrics, 129(3), 636–642.
  13. Baranowski, T., Baranowski, J., Cullen, K. W., Marsh, T., Islam, N., Zakeri, I., & Honess-Morreale, L. (2003). Squire’s Quest!: Dietary outcome evaluation of a multimedia game. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24, 52–61.
  14. Baranowski, T., Buday, R., Thompson, D. I., & Baranowski, J. (2008). Playing for real: Video games and stories for health-related behavior change. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34, 74–82.
  15. Baranowski, T., Thompson, D., Buday, R., Lu, A. S., & Baranowski, J. (2010). Design of video games for children’s diet and physical activity behavior change. International Journal of Computer Science in Sport, 9, 3–17.
  16. Bargh, J. A. (2008). Free will is un-natural. In J. Baer, J. C. Kaufman, & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Are We Free? Psychology and free will (pp. 128–54). New York: Oxford University Press.
  17. Barnett, A., Cerin, E., & Baranowski, T. (2011). Active video games for youth: A systematic review. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 8, 724–737.
  18. Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 364, 1281–1289.
  19. Biddiss, E., & Irwin, J. (2010). Active video games to promote physical activity in children and youth: A systematic review. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 164, 664–672.
  20. Biocca, F. (1997). The cyborg’s dilemma: Progressive embodiment in virtual environments. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3, doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00070.x.
  21. Biocca, F., Inoue, Y., Lee, A., Polinsky, H., & Tang, A. (2002). Visual cues and virtual touch: Role of visual stimuli and intersensory integration in cross-modal haptic illusions and the sense of presence. Proceedings of Presence, 410–428.
  22. Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature, 391, 756.
  23. Bowman, D. A., & McMahan, R. P. (2007). Virtual reality: How much immersion is enough? Computer, 40, 36–43.
  24. Campbell, W. K., & Foster, J. D. (2007). The narcissistic self: Background, an extended agency model, and ongoing controversies. In C. Sedikides & S. J. Spender (Eds.), Frontiers of social psychology. The self (pp. 115–138). New York: Psychology Press.
  25. Chin, J., Dukes, R., & Gamson, W. (2009). Assessment in simulation and gaming: A review of the last 40 years. Simulation & Gaming, 40, 553–568.
  26. Craik, K. J. W. (1943). The Nature of explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  27. Cummings, J. J., & Bailenson, J. N. (2016). How immersive is enough? A meta-analysis of the effect of immersive technology on user presence. Media Psychology, 19, 272–309.
  28. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554–571.
  29. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024–1037.
  30. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Education Psychology, 25, 54–67.
  31. De Graaf, A., Hoeken, H., Sanders, J., & Beentjes, J. W. (2012). Identification as a mechanism of narrative persuasion. Communication Research, 39(6), 802–823.
  32. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gameful- ness: Defining “gamification”. In MindTrek ‘11: Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference on Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9–15), 28–30 September, Tampere, Finland. New York: ACM.
  33. ESA (2017, October 3). Industry Facts. Retrieved from http://www.theesa.com/about-esa/
  34. industry-facts/.
  35. Escalas, J. E. (2004). Imagine yourself in the product: Mental simulation, narrative transportation, and persuasion. Journal of Advertising, 33, 37–48.
  36. Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 22, 35–52.
  37. Fleeson, W. (2001). Towards a structure and process integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of state. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011–1027.
  38. Fortin, D. R., & Dholakia, R. R. (2005). Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertisement. Journal of Business Research, 58, 387–396.
  39. Fox, J., Bailenson, J. N., & Tricase, L. (2013). The embodiment of sexualized virtual selves: The Proteus effect and experiences of self-objectification via avatars. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 930–938.
  40. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362.
  41. Gao, Z., Chen, S., Pasco, D., & Pope, Z. (2015). A meta-analysis of active video games on health outcomes among children and adolescents. Obesity Reviews, 16, 783–794.
  42. Gartner (October 2017a). Top trends in the Gartner hype cycle for emerging technologies, 2017. Retrieved from http://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/top-trends-in-the-gartner- hype-cycle-for-emerging-technologies-2017/
  43. Gartner (October 2017b). The hype is over—gamification is here to stay. Retrieved from https://www.gamified.uk/2015/08/21/the-hype-is-over-gamification-is-here-to-stay/
  44. Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  45. Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014, January). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In (HICSS): 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3025–3034), 6–9 January, Waikoloa, Hawaii. Redhook, NY: Curran Associates.
  46. Hartmann T., Wirth W., Vorderer P., Klimmt C., Schramm H., & Böcking S. (2015). Spatial presence theory: State of the art and challenges ahead. In M. Lombard, F. Biocca, J. Freeman, W. IJsselsteijn, & R. Schaevitz (Eds.) Immersed in Media. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  47. Heeter, C. (1992). Being there: The subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 1, 262–271.
  48. Heeter, C. (2000). Interactivity in the context of designed experiences. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1, 3–14.
  49. Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E. U., & Erev, I. (2004). Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychological Science, 15, 534–539.
  50. Hogle, J. G. (1996). Considering games as cognitive tools: In search of effective “edutainment.” Department of Instructional Technology, University of Georgia (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 425 737).
  51. Hubona, G. S., Wheeler, P. N., Shirah, G. W., & Brandt, M. (1999). The relative contributions of stereo, lighting, and background scenes in promoting 3D depth visualization. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 6, 214–242.
  52. Huizinga, J. (1955). 1938. Homo ludens: A study of the play element in culture. Abingdon: Routledge.
  53. Jander, A., Crutzen, R., Mercken, L., & De Vries, H. (2014). A web-based computer-tailored game to reduce binge drinking among 16- to 18-year-old Dutch adolescents: Development and study protocol. BMC Public Health, 14(1), 1054.
  54. Jiow, H. J., & Lim, S. S. (2012). The evolution of video game affordances and implications for parental mediation. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 32, 455–462.
  55. Johnson, D., Deterding, S., Kuhn, K. A., Staneva, A., Stoyanov, S., & Hides, L. (2016). Gamification for health and wellbeing: A systematic review of the literature. Internet Interventions, 6, 89–106.
  56. Kalyanaraman, S., Penn, D., Ivory, J., & Judge, A. (2010). The virtual doppelganger: Effects of a virtual reality simulator on perceptions of schizophrenia. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders, 198, 437–443.
  57. Kim, T., & Biocca, F. (1997). Telepresence via television: Two dimensions of telepresence may have different connections to memory and persuasion. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3, JCMC325. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00073.x.
  58. Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14, 27–50.
  59. Leiner, D. J., & Quiring, O. (2008). What interactivity means to the user essential insights into and a scale for perceived interactivity. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 127–155.
  60. Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 28, 129–137.
  61. Lewis, Z. H., Swartz, M. C., & Lyons, E. J. (2016). What’s the point? A review of reward systems implemented in gamification interventions. Games for Health Journal, 5, 93–99.
  62. Limperos, A. M. (2017). Video games and gaming: Reaching audiences with health and risk messages. In R. Parrott (Ed.), Encyclopedia of health and risk message design and processing. New York: Oxford University Press.
  63. Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of ComputerMediated Communication, 3, JCMC321. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x.
  64. Maloney, A. E., Bethea, T. C., Kelsey, K. S., Marks, J. T., Paez, S., Rosenberg, A. M.,… Sikich, L. (2008). A pilot of a video game (DDR) to promote physical activity and decrease sedentary screen time. Obesity, 16(9), 2074–2080.
  65. Marsella, S. C., Johnson, W. L., & LaBore, C. (2000). Interactive pedagogical drama. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on autonomous agents (pp. 301–308), 3–7 June, Barcelona, Spain. New York: ACM.
  66. Mentzoni, R. A., Brunborg, G. S., Molde, H., Myrseth, H., Skouverøe, K. J. M., Hetland, J., & Pallesen, S. (2011). Problematic video game use: Estimated prevalence and associations with mental and physical health. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 591–596.
  67. McCain, J., Gentile, B., & Campbell, W. K. (2015). A psychological exploration of engagement in geek culture. PLoS One, 10, 1–39.
  68. McGloin, R., Farrar, K. M., & Krcmar, M. (2011). The impact of controller naturalness on spatial presence, gamer enjoyment, and perceived realism in a tennis simulation video game. Presence, 20, 309–324.
  69. Michael, D. R., & Chen, S. L. (2005). Serious games: Games that educate, train, and inform. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
  70. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–68.
  71. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309–326.
  72. Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 177–196.
  73. Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions, 6, 38–43.
  74. Orji, R., Mandryk, R. L., Vassileva, J., & Gerling, K. M. (2013). Tailoring persuasive health
  75. games to gamer type. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in
  76. Computing Systems (pp. 2467–2476), 27 April–2 May, Paris, France. New York: ACM.
  77. Peng, W., Crouse, J. C., & Lin, J. H. (2013). Using active video games for physical activity promotion: A systematic review of the current state of research. Health Education & Behavior, 40, 171–192.
  78. Persky, S., & Blascovich, J. (2008). Immersive virtual video game play and presence: Influences on aggressive feelings and behavior. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 17,
  79. 57–72.
  80. Persky, S., & McBride, C. M. (2009). Immersive virtual environment technology: A promising tool for future social and behavioral genomics research and practice. Health Communication, 24, 677–682.
  81. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Message elaboration versus peripheral cues. In Communication and Persuasion (pp. 141–172). New York: Springer.
  82. Primack, B. A., Carroll, M. V., McNamara, M., Klem, M. L., King, B., Rich, M.,… Nayak, S. (2012). Role of video games in improving health-related outcomes: A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 42, 630–638.
  83. Przybylski, A. K., Rigby, C. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). A motivational model of video game engagement. Review of General Psychology, 14, 154.
  84. Rajecki, D. W. (1982). Attitudes: Themes and advances. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Rapp, A. (2017). Designing interactive systems through a game lens: An ethnographic approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 455–468.
  85. Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 161–198.
  86. Rice, R. E., & Williams, F. (1984). Theories old and new: The study of new media. In R. E. Rice and Associates (Eds.), The New Media: Communication, Research, and Technology (pp. 55–80). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  87. Ritterfeld, U., & Weber, R. (2006). Video games for entertainment and education. In P. Vorderer & J. Bryant (Eds.), Playing video games: Motives, Responses, and Consequences (pp. 399–413). London: Routledge.
  88. Rizzo, A. S., Lange, B., Suma, E. A., & Bolas, M. (2011). Virtual reality and interactive digital game technology: New tools to address obesity and diabetes. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 5, 256–264.
  89. Ryan, R. M., Connell, J. P., & Deci, E. L. (1985). A motivational analysis of self-determination and self-regulation in education. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on Motivation in Education: The Classroom Milieu (Vol. 2) (pp. 13–51). New York: Academic Press.
  90. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
  91. Ryan, R. M., Rigby, C. S., & Przybylski, A. (2006). The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 344–360.
  92. Sacau, A., Laarni, J., & Hartmann, T. (2008). Influence of individual factors on presence. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2255–2273.
  93. Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
  94. Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2005). Game design and meaningful play. In J. Raessens & J. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of Computer Game Studies (pp. 59–79). Cambridge, MA:
  95. MIT Press.
  96. Sanchez-Vives, M. V., & Slater, M. (2005). From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 332–339.
  97. Sanchez-Vives, M. V., Spanlang, B., Frisoli, A., Bergamasco, M., & Slater, M. (2010). Virtual hand illusion induced by visuomotor correlations. PLoS One 5, e10381. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010381.
  98. Seaborn, K., & Fels, D. I. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74, 14–31.
  99. Sherry, J. L. (2004). Flow and media enjoyment. Communication Theory, 14, 328–347.
  100. Skalski, P., Tamborini, R., Lange, R., & Shelton, A. (2007). Mapping the road to fun: Natural video game controllers, presence, and game enjoyment. Paper presented at the 57th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, 24–29 May, San Francisco, California.
  101. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and Human Behavior. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  102. Slater, M. (2009). Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive
  103. virtual environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 364, 3549–3557.
  104. Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42, 73–93.
  105. Tamborini, R. (2000). The experience of telepresence in violent video games. In 86th Annual Convention of the National Communication Association, Seattle, WA.
  106. Tamborini, R., & Bowman, N. D. (2010). Presence in video games. In C. Campanella Bracken & P. D. Skalski (Eds.), Immersed in Media: Telepresence in Everyday Life (pp. 87–109). New York: Routledge.
  107. Tamborini, R., Grizzard, M., David Bowman, N., Reinecke, L., Lewis, R. J., & Eden, A. (2011). Media enjoyment as need satisfaction: The contribution of hedonic and nonhedonic needs. Journal of Communication, 61, 1025–1042.
  108. Tamborini, R., & Skalski, P. (2006). The role of presence in the experience of electronic games. In P. Vorderer & J. Bryant (Eds.), Playing Video Games: Motives, Responses, and Consequences (pp. 225–240). London: Routledge.
  109. Teather, R. J., & Stuerzlinger, W. (2007). Guidelines for 3D positioning techniques. In Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Future Play (pp. 61–68). New York: ACM.
  110. Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36, 143–189.
  111. Twenge, J. M., Konrath, S., Foster, J. D., Campbell, W. K., & Bushman, B. J. (2008). Egos inflating over time: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory. Journal of Personality, 76, 875–902.
  112. Van Der Heide, B., Schumaker, E. M., Peterson, A. M., & Jones, E. B. (2013). The Proteus effect in dyadic communication: Examining the effect of avatar appearance in computer-mediated dyadic interaction. Communication Research, 40, 838–860.
  113. Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.
  114. von Ahn, L., & Dabbish, L. (2008). Designing games with a purpose. Communications of the ACM, 51, 57.
  115. Walther, J. B. (2011). Theories of computer-mediated communication and interpersonal relations. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.),The Sage Handbook of interpersonal communication (4th ed.) (pp. 443–479). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  116. Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed.) (pp. 529–563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  117. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625–636.
  118. Won, A. S., Bailenson, J., Lee, J., & Lanier, J. (2015). Homuncular flexibility in virtual reality. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 241–259.
  119. Yee, N. (2014). The Proteus paradox: How online games and virtual worlds change us-and how they don’t. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  120. Yee, N., & Bailenson, J. (2007). The Proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human Communication Research, 33, 271–290.
  121. Yee, N., & Bailenson, J. N. (2009). The difference between being and seeing: The relative con-tribution of self-perception and priming to behavioral changes via digital self-representation. Media Psychology, 12, 195–209.
  122. Yee, N., Bailenson, J. N., & Ducheneaut, N. (2009). The Proteus effect: Implications of transformed digital self-representation on online and offline behavior. Communication Research, 36, 285–312.
  123. Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1985). Affect, mood, and emotion as determinants of selective exposure. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Selective exposure to communication (pp. 157–190). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
سایر مقالات