خانه » مقالات » فصل پانزدهم: روان‌شناسی حضور منفعلانه در فعالیت‌های برخط
فصل پانزدهم: روان‌شناسی حضور منفعلانه در فعالیت‌های برخط
سه شنبه, ۰۱ مهر ۱۴۰۴
زمان تقریبی مطالعه ۴۶ دقیقه

کتاب‌نامه

  1. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing Course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Oaklandm CA: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED541571.pdf
  2. Argyle, M. (2013). Bodily communication. New York: Routledge.
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 84(2), 191.
  4. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist 28(2), 117–148.
  5. Barak, A., & Dolev-Cohen, M. (2006). Does activity level in online support groups for distressed adolescents determine emotional relief. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research 6(3), 186–190.
  6. Beaudoin, M. F. (2002). Learning or lurking? Tracking the “invisible” online student. The Internet and Higher Education 5(2), 147–155.
  7. Belfi, L. M., Bartolotta, R. J., Giambrone, A. E., Davi, C., & Min, R. J. (2015). “Flipping” the introductory clerkship in radiology: Impact on medical student performance and perceptions. Academic Radiology 22(6), 794–801.
  8. Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education 84(6), 740–756.
  9. Blumler, J. G., & Katz, E. (Eds.) (1974). The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Sage Annual Reviews of Communication Research Volume III. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  10. Bryant, S. L., Forte, A., & Bruckman, A. (2005). Becoming Wikipedian: Transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia. In Proceedings of the 2005 International ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work (pp. 1–10) 6–9 November, Sanibel Island, FL. New York: ACM.
  11. Burke, M., Marlow, C., & Lento, T. (2009). Feed me: Motivating newcomer contribution in social network sites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 945–954), 4–9 April, Boston, MA. New York: ACM.
  12. Carr, T., Cox, L., Eden, N., & Hanslo, M. (2004). From peripheral to full participation in a blended trade bargaining simulation. British Journal of Educational Technology 35(2), 197–211.
  13. Chung, J. E. (2014). Social networking in online support groups for health: How online social networking benefits patients. Journal of Health Communication 19(6), 639–659.
  14. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology 94, 95–120.
  15. Cooner, T. S. (2010). Creating opportunities for students in large cohorts to reflect in and on practice: Lessons learnt from a formative evaluation of students’ experiences of a technology- enhanced blended learning design. British Journal of Educational Technology 41(2), 271–286.
  16. Cullen, R., & Morse, S. (2011). Who’s contributing: Do personality traits influence the level and type of participation in online communities. In 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 1–11). 4–7 January, Kauai, Hawaii. New York: IEEE.
  17. Cullen, R., & Sommer, L. (2011). Participatory democracy and the value of online community networks: An exploration of online and offline communities engaged in civil society and political activity. Government Information Quarterly 28(2), 148–154.
  18. Davies, J., & Graff, M. (2005). Performance in e-learning: Online participation and student grades. British Journal of Educational Technology 36(4), 657–663.
  19. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319–340.
  20. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry 11(4), 227–268.
  21. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-Determination Theory: A Macrotheory of Human Motivation, Development, and Health. Canadian Psychology 49(3): 182–185.
  22. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2011). Self-determination theory. In P. A. M Van Lange, W. Kruglanski, and E. T. Higgens (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology Vol. 1 (pp. 416–433). London: Sage.
  23. Dekker, G., Pechenizkiy, M., & Vleeshouwers, J. (2009). Predicting students drop out: A case study. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM) (pp. 41–50), 1–3 July, Cordoba, Spain. Worcester, MA: IEDMS.
  24. Dennen, V. P. (2008). Pedagogical lurking: Student engagement in non-posting discussion behavior. Computers in Human Behavior 24(4), 1624–1633.
  25. Desai, M. S., Hart, J., & Richards, T. C. (2008). E-learning: Paradigm shift in education. Education 129(2), 327–335.
  26. Deschacht, N., & Goeman, K. (2015). The effect of blended learning on course persistence and performance of adult learners: A difference-in-differences analysis. Computers & Education 87, 83–89.
  27. Diaz, D. P. (2000). Comparison of student characteristics, and evaluation of student success, in an online health education course (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
  28. Du, Y. (2006). Modeling the behavior of lurkers in online communities using intentional agents. In International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modelling Control and Automation and International Conference on Intelligent Agents, Web Technologies and Internet Commerce CIMCA ‘06 (p. 60). 28 November–1 December, Sydney, NSW, Australia. New York: IEEE.
  29. Edelmann, N. (2013). Reviewing the definitions of “lurkers” and some implications for online research. Cyberpsychology, Behavior & Social Networking 16(9), 645–649.
  30. Fåhræus, E. R. (2004). Distance education students moving towards collaborative learning-A field study of Australian distance education students and systems. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 7(2), 129–140.
  31. Firat, M., Kılınç, H., & Yüzer, T. V. (2018). Level of intrinsic motivation of distance education students in e-learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 34(1), 63–70.
  32. Frankola, K. (2001). Why online learners drop out. Workforce 80(10), 53–59.
  33. Fullwood, C. (2007). The effect of mediation on impression formation: A comparison of face-to-face & video-mediated conditions. Applied Ergonomics 38, 267–273.
  34. Fullwood, C. (2016). Online support groups: Enhancing the user experience with cyberpsychological theory. In A. Attrill & C. Fullwood (Eds.), Applied Cyberpsychology: Practical applications of cyberpsychological research and theory. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  35. Fullwood, C., & Finn, M. (2010). Video-mediated communication and impression formation: An integrative review. In A. C. Rayler (Ed.), Videoconferencing: Technology, Impact and Applications (pp. 35–55). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
  36. Fullwood, C., Quinn, S., Chen-Wilson, J., Chadwick, D., & Reynolds, K. (2015). Put on a smiley face: Textspeak and personality perceptions. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 18(3), 147–151.
  37. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education 7(2), 95–105.
  38. Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., & Gijselaers, W. (2013). Investigating the relations between motivation, tool use, participation, and performance in an e-learning course using web-videoconferencing. Computers in Human Behavior 29(1), 285–292.
  39. Ginns, P., Prosser, M., & Barrie, S. (2007). Students’ perceptions of teaching quality in higher education: The perspective of currently enrolled students. Studies in Higher Education 32(5), 603–615.
  40. Goeman, K., & Van Laer, S. (2012). Blended multicampus education for lifelong learners. In The future of learning innovations and learning quality. How do they fit together: Proceedings of the European Conference LINQ 2012 (pp. 97–103). 23 October, Brussels, Belgium. Berlin: Gito.
  41. Golder, S. A., & Donath, J. (2004). Social roles in electronic communities. Internet Research 5, 19–22.
  42. Han, J. Y., Hou, J., Kim, E., & Gustafson, D. H. (2014). Lurking as an active participation process: A longitudinal investigation of engagement with an online cancer support group. Health Communication 29(9), 911–923.
  43. Han, J. Y., Kim, J. H., Yoon, H. J., Shim, M., McTavish, F. M., & Gustafson, D. H. (2012). Social and psychological determinants of levels of engagement with an online breast cancer support group: Posters, lurkers, and nonusers. Journal of Health Communication 17(3), 356–371.
  44. Han, J. Y., Shah, D. V., Kim, E., Namkoong, K., Lee, S. Y., Moon, T. J., Cleland, R., Bu, Q. L., McTavish, F. M… . & Gustafson, D. H. (2011). Empathic exchanges in online cancer support groups: Distinguishing message expression and reception effects. Health Communication 26(2), 185–197.
  45. Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2008). Attracting student participation in asynchronous online discussions: A case study of peer facilitation. Computers & Education 51(3), 1111–1124.
  46. Hill, J. R., Song, L., & West, R. E. (2009). Social learning theory and web-based learning environments:
  47. A review of research and discussion of implications. The American Journal of Distance Education 23(2), 88–103.
  48. Hiltz, S. R., Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision making communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human communication research 13(2), 225–252.
  49. Horng, S. M. (2016). A study of active and passive user participation in virtual communities. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 17(4).
  50. Hrastinski, S. (2008). The potential of synchronous communication to enhance participation in online discussions: A case study of two e-learning courses. Information & Management 45(7), 499–506.
  51. Hughes, J. N., Luo, W., Kwok, O. M., & Loyd, L. K. (2008). Teacher-student support, effortful engagement, and achievement: A 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology 100(1), 1.
  52. Johnson, L., Adams, S., & Cummins, M. (2012). Technology outlook for Australian Tertiary Education 2012–2017: An NMC horizon report regional analysis. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Accessed on 10/08/2017 Retrieve from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED532405
  53. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., and Freeman, A. (2015). NMC Horizon Report: 2015 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Accessed on 10/08/2017 from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED559357.pdf
  54. Koh, J., Kim, Y. G., Butler, B., & Bock, G. W. (2007). Encouraging participation in virtual communities. Communications of the ACM 50(2), 68–73.
  55. Kollock, P., & Smith, M. (1996). Managing the virtual commons. In Susan Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, Social, and Cross-Cultural Perspectives (pp. 109–128). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  56. Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues 58(1), 49–74.
  57. Küçük, M. (2010). Lurking in online asynchronous discussion. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences 2, 2260–2263.
  58. Ladd, G. W., & Dinella, L. M. (2009). Continuity and change in early school engagement: Predictive of children’s achievement trajectories from first to eighth grade? Journal of Educational Psychology 101(1), 190.
  59. Laine, M. S. S., Ercal, G., & Luo, B. (2011). User groups in social networks: An experimental study on YouTube. In 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 1–10). 4–7 January, Kauai, Hawaii. New York: IEEE.
  60. Lakhani, K. R., & Von Hippel, E. (2003). How open source software works: “Free” user-to-user assistance. Research Policy 32(6), 923–943.
  61. Levy, Y. (2007). Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses. Computers & Education 48(2), 185–204.
  62. Liu, Q., Peng, W., Zhang, F., Hu, R., Li, Y., & Yan, W. (2016). The effectiveness of blended learning in health professions: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 18(1), e2. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4807
  63. Malik, S. H., & Coulson, N. S. (2011). A comparison of lurkers and posters within infertility online support groups. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 29(10), 564–573.
  64. Malinen, S. (2015). Understanding user participation in online communities: A systematic literature review of empirical studies. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 228–238.
  65. Mason, B. (1999). Issues in virtual ethnography. In K. Buckner (Ed.), Proceedings of Esprit i3 workshop on ethnographic studies in real and virtual environments: Inhabited information spaces and connected communities (pp. 61–69), 24–26 January, Edinburgh, Scotland. New York: ACM.
  66. Mazuro, C., & Rao, N. (2011). Online discussion forums in higher education: Is lurking working. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education 2(2), 364–371.
  67. McKenna, K. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (1998). Coming out in the age of the Internet: Identity “demarginalization” through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75(3), 681.
  68. Mo, P. K., & Coulson, N. S. (2010). Empowering processes in online support groups among people living with HIV/AIDS: A comparative analysis of “lurkers” and “posters.” Computers in Human Behavior 26, 1183–1193.
  69. Moller, L., Foshay, W. R., & Huett, J. (2008). Implications for instructional design on the potential of the web. TechTrends, 52(4), 67.
  70. Moskal, P., Dziuban, C., & Hartman, J. (2013). Blended learning: A dangerous idea? The Internet and Higher Education 18, 15–23.
  71. Muller, M. (2012). Lurking as a personal trait or situational disposition? Lurking and contributing in enterprise social media. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work CSCW ‘12 (pp. 253–256), 11–15 February, Seattle, Washington. New York: ACM. Koh, J., Kim, Y. G., Butler, B., & Bock, G. W. (2007). Encouraging participation in virtual communities. Communications of the ACM 50(2), 68–73.
  72. Kollock, P., & Smith, M. (1996). Managing the virtual commons. In Susan Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, Social, and Cross-Cultural Perspectives (pp. 109–128). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  73. Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues 58(1), 49–74.
  74. Küçük, M. (2010). Lurking in online asynchronous discussion. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences 2, 2260–2263.
  75. Ladd, G. W., & Dinella, L. M. (2009). Continuity and change in early school engagement: Predictive of children’s achievement trajectories from first to eighth grade? Journal of Educational Psychology 101(1), 190.
  76. Laine, M. S. S., Ercal, G., & Luo, B. (2011). User groups in social networks: An experimental study on YouTube. In 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 1–10). 4–7 January, Kauai, Hawaii. New York: IEEE.
  77. Lakhani, K. R., & Von Hippel, E. (2003). How open source software works: “Free” user-to-user assistance. Research Policy 32(6), 923–943.
  78. Levy, Y. (2007). Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses. Computers & Education 48(2), 185–204.
  79. Liu, Q., Peng, W., Zhang, F., Hu, R., Li, Y., & Yan, W. (2016). The effectiveness of blended learning in health professions: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 18(1), e2. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4807
  80. Malik, S. H., & Coulson, N. S. (2011). A comparison of lurkers and posters within infertility online support groups. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 29(10), 564–573.
  81. Malinen, S. (2015). Understanding user participation in online communities: A systematic literature review of empirical studies. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 228–238.
  82. Mason, B. (1999). Issues in virtual ethnography. In K. Buckner (Ed.), Proceedings of Esprit i3 workshop on ethnographic studies in real and virtual environments: Inhabited information spaces and connected communities (pp. 61–69), 24–26 January, Edinburgh, Scotland. New York: ACM.
  83. Mazuro, C., & Rao, N. (2011). Online discussion forums in higher education: Is lurking working. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education 2(2), 364–371.
  84. McKenna, K. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (1998). Coming out in the age of the Internet: Identity “demarginalization” through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75(3), 681.
  85. Mo, P. K., & Coulson, N. S. (2010). Empowering processes in online support groups among people living with HIV/AIDS: A comparative analysis of “lurkers” and “posters.” Computers in Human Behavior 26, 1183–1193.
  86. Moller, L., Foshay, W. R., & Huett, J. (2008). Implications for instructional design on the potential of the web. TechTrends, 52(4), 67.
  87. Moskal, P., Dziuban, C., & Hartman, J. (2013). Blended learning: A dangerous idea? The Internet and Higher Education 18, 15–23.
  88. Muller, M. (2012). Lurking as a personal trait or situational disposition? Lurking and contributing in enterprise social media. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work CSCW ‘12 (pp. 253–256), 11–15 February, Seattle, Washington. New York: ACM.
  89. Neelen, M., & Fetter, S. (2010). Lurking: A challenge or a fruitful strategy? A comparison between lurkers and active participants in an online corporate community of practice. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning 6(4), 269–284.
  90. Nimrod, G. (2016). Beneficial participation: Lurking vs. posting in online support groups. In R. Ahmed & Bates, B. R. (Eds.), Health communication and mass media: An integrated approach to policy and practice (pp. 81–98). New York: Routledge.
  91. Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2001). Why lurkers lurk. AMCIS 2001 Proceedings, 294.
  92. Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2003). Silent participants: Getting to know lurkers better. In C. Lueg & D. Fisher (Eds.), From Usenet to CoWebs: Interacting with social information spaces (pp. 110–132). London: Springer Verlag.
  93. Nonnecke, B., Preece, J., & Andrews, D. (2004, January). What lurkers and posters think of each other [online community]. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. New York: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265462
  94. Nonnecke, B., Andrews, D., & Preece, J. (2006). Non-public and public online community participation: Needs, attitudes and behavior. Electronic Commerce Research 6(1), 7–20.
  95. Nov, O., Arazy, O., L َ pez, C., & Brusilovsky, P. (2013, April). Exploring personality-targeted UI design in online social participation systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 361–370). ACM.
  96. Oh, H. J., Lauckner, C., Boehmer, J., Fewins-Bliss, R., & Li, K. (2013). Facebooking for health: An examination into the solicitation and effects of health-related social support on social networking sites. Computers in Human Behavior 29(5), 2072–2080.
  97. Orchard, L. J., & Fullwood, C. (2010). Current perspectives on personality and Internet use. Social Science Computer Review 28(2), 155–169.
  98. Osatuyi, B. (2015). Is lurking an anxiety-masking strategy on social media sites? The effects of lurking and computer anxiety on explaining information privacy concern on social media platforms. Computers in Human Behavior 49, 324–332.
  99. Palmer, S., Holt, D., & Bray, S. (2008). Does the discussion help? The impact of a formally assessed online discussion on final student results. British Journal of Educational Technology 39(5), 847–858.
  100. Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 12(3), 150.
  101. Pennebaker, J. W. (1997). Opening up: The healing power of emotional expression. New York: Guilford.
  102. Preece, J., Nonnecke, B., & Andrews, D. (2004). The top 5 reasons for lurking: Improving community experiences for everyone. Special Issue of Computers in Human Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Perspective 20(2), 201–223.
  103. Rau, P. L. P., Gao, Q., & Ding, Y. (2008). Relationship between the level of intimacy and lurking in online social network services. Computers in Human Behavior 24(6), 2757–2770.
  104. Rice, R. E., & Love, G. (1987). Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computermediated communication network. Communication Research 14(1), 85–108.
  105. Richardson, C. R., Buis, L. R., Janney, A. W., Goodrich, D. E., Sen, A., Hess, M. L., Mehari, K. S., Fortlage, L. A., Resnick, P. J., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Strecher, V. J.,… & Strecher, V. J. (2010). An online community improves adherence in an Internet-mediated walking program. Part 1: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 12(4), e71.
  106. Ridings, C. M., & Gefen, D. (2004). Virtual community attraction: Why people hang out online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10(1). doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2004. tb00229.x
  107. Ridings, C., Gefen, D., & Arinze, B. (2006). Psychological barriers: Lurker and poster motivation and behavior in online communities. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 18(1), 16.
  108. Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W., & Segers, M. (2009). The role of academic motivation in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior 25(6), 1195–1206.
  109. Rivera, J. C., & Rice, M. L. (2002). A comparison of student outcomes & satisfaction between traditional & web-based course offerings. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration 5(3). Retrieved from https://docplayer.net/10007747-A-comparison-of-student-outcomessatisfaction- between-traditional-web-based-course-offerings.html
  110. Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M. G., & Orr, R. R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior 25(2), 578–586.
  111. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology 25(1), 54–67.
  112. Schneider, A., Von Krogh, G., & J ن ger, P. (2013). “What’s coming next?” Epistemic curiosity and lurking behavior in online communities. Computers in Human Behavior 29(1), 293–303.
  113. Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 7(3), 321–326. Sun, N., Rau, P. P. L., & Ma, L. (2014). Understanding lurkers in online communities: A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior 38, 110–117.
  114. Tanis, M., Das, E., & Fortgens-Sillmann, M. (2011). Finding care for the caregiver? Active participation in online health forums attenuates the negative effect of caregiver strain on well-being. Communications 36(1), 51–66.
  115. Taylor, J., & Turner, R. J. (2001). A longitudinal study of the role and significance of mattering to others for depressive symptoms. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 42(3), 310–325.
  116. Tonteri, L., Kosonen, M., Ellonen, H. K., & Tarkiainen, A. (2011). Antecedents of an experienced sense of virtual community. Computers in Human Behavior 27(6), 2215–2223.
  117. Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  118. Van Raaij, E. M., & Schepers, J. J. L. (2008). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers and Education 50, 838–852.
  119. Van Uden-Kraan, C. F., Drossaert, C. H. C., Taal, E., Shaw, B. R., Seydel, E. R., & Van de Laar, M. A. F. J. (2008). Empowering processes and outcomes of participation in online support groups for patients with breast cancer, arthritis, or fibromyalgia. Qualitative Health Research 18(3), 405–417.
  120. Van Uden-Kraan, C. F., Drossaert, C. H., Taal, E., Smit, W. M., Moens, H. J. B., Siesling, S., Seydel, E.R., & Van de Laar, M. A. (2009). Health-related Internet use by patients with somatic diseases: Frequency of use and characteristics of users. Informatics for Health and Social Care 34(1), 18–29.
  121. Vanslambrouck, S., Zhu, C., Lombaerts, K., Philipsen, B., & Tondeur, J. (2018). Students’ motivation
  122. and subjective task value of participating in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education 36, 33–40.
  123. Vaughan, N. (2007). Perspectives on blended learning in higher education. International Journal on eLearning 6(1), 81.

سایر مقالات
فصل سی‌ام: طبقه‌بندی بازی‌ها و ویژگی‌های جمعیت‌شناختی بازیکنان
چهار شنبه, ۰۲ مهر ۱۴۰۴
حکمرانی فضای مجازی/ دکترین حکمرانی فضای مجازی ایران و حفاظت از داده
دوشنبه, ۰۷ مهر ۱۳۹۹
فصل چهارم: شخصیت و کاربرد اینترنت: درون‌گرایی و برون‌گرایی
سه شنبه, ۰۱ مهر ۱۴۰۴
فصل سی‌ویکم: ظهور جرایم فضای مجازی
چهار شنبه, ۰۲ مهر ۱۴۰۴