خانه » مقالات » فصل نهم: زبان پیامکی: زبان در دنیای آنلاین
فصل نهم: زبان پیامکی: زبان در دنیای آنلاین
سه شنبه, ۰۱ مهر ۱۴۰۴
زمان تقریبی مطالعه ۲۶ دقیقه

بخش سوم: تعامل و تعامل‌پذیری

کتاب‌نامه

  1. Aldunate, N., & Gonzalez-Ibanez, R. (2017). An integrated review of emoticons in computermediated communication. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–6. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02061
  2. Bamman, D., Eisenstein, J., & Schnoebelen, T. (2014). Gender identity and lexical variation in social media. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18, 135–160. doi: 10.1111/josl.12080
  3. Bieswanger, M. (2007). 2 abbrevi8 or not 2 abbrevi8: A contrastive analysis of different space- and time-saving strategies in English and German text messages. Texas Linguistics Forum, 50. Retrieved May 11, 2018, from http://salsa.ling.utexas.edu/proceedings/2006/Bieswanger.pdf
  4. Blair, B. L., & Fletcher, A. C. (2011). “The only 13-year-old on planet Earth without a cell phone”: Meanings of cell phones in early adolescents’ everyday lives. Journal of Adolescent Research, 26, 155–177. doi: 10.1177/0743558410371127
  5. Bodomo, A. B. (2010). Computer-Mediated Communication for Linguistics and Literacy: Technology and Natural Language Education. Hershey, NY: Information Science Reference. Retrieved from http://www.classjump.com/sideeg/documents/CMC.pdf
  6. Burt, J. S., & Long, J. (2011). Are word representations abstract or instance-based? Effects of spelling inconsistency in orthographic learning. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 214–228. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0023708
  7. Cingel, D. P., & Sundar, S. S. (2012). Texting, techspeak, and tweens: The relationship between text messaging and English grammar skills. New Media & Society, 14, 1304–1320. doi: 10.1177/1461444812442927
  8. Coe, J. E. L., & Oakhill, J. V. (2011). “text is ez f u no h2 rd”: The relation between reading ability and text-messaging behaviour. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 4–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00404.x
  9. Crowe, S. M. (2014). Tutees @ skool: How students and teachers use and respond to the language of digital communication. (Unpublished honours thesis). University of Tasmania.
  10. Crystal, D. (2008). Txtng: The gr8 db8. Oxford: Oxford University Press. De Jonge, S., & Kemp, N. (2012). Text-message abbreviations and language skills in high school and university students. Journal of Research in Reading, 35, 49–68. doi 10.1111/j.1467-9817. 2010.01466.x
  11. Dixon, M., & Kaminska, Z. (1997). Is it misspelled or is it mispelled? The influence of fresh orthographic information on spelling. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9, 483–498. doi: 10.1023/A:1007955314533
  12. Drouin, M. A. (2011). College students’ text messaging, use of textese and literacy skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 67–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00399.x
  13. Drouin, M., & Davis, C. (2009). R u txting? Is the use of text speak hurting your literacy? Journal of Literacy Research, 41, 46–67. doi: 10.1080/10862960802695131
  14. Drouin, M. & Driver, B. (2014). Texting, textese and literacy abilities: A naturalistic study. Journal of Research in Reading, 37, 250–267. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01532.x
  15. Durkin, K., Conti-Ramsden, G., & Walker, A. J. (2011). Txt lang: Texting, textism use and literacy abilities in adolescents with and without specific language impairment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 49–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00397.x
  16. Ericsson (2015). Ericsson mobility report. Retrieved from http://www.ericsson.com/res/ docs/2015/ericsson-mobility-report-june-2015.pdf
  17. Faulkner, X., & Culwin, F. (2005). When fingers do the talking: A study of text messaging. Interacting with Computers, 17, 167–185. doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2004.11.002
  18. Frehner, C. (2008). Email—SMS—MMS: The linguistic creativity of asynchronous discourse in the new media age. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  19. Fullwood, C., Quinn, S., Chen-Wilson, J., Chadwick, D., & Reynolds, K. (2015). Put on a smiley face: Textspeak and personality perceptions. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour, and Social Networking, 18, 147–151. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0463
  20. Giles, H. (2016). The social origins of CAT. In H. Giles (Ed.), Communication Accommodation Theory: Negotiating personal relationships and social identities across contexts (pp. 1–12). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  21. Grace, A., & Kemp, N. (2015). Text messaging language: A comparison of undergraduates’ naturalistic textism use in four consecutive cohorts. Writing Systems Research, 7(2), 220–234. doi: 10.1080/17586801.2014.898575
  22. Grace, A., Kemp, N., Martin, F. H., & Parrila, R. (2012). Undergraduates’ use of text messaging language: Effects of country and collection method. Writing Systems Research, 4, 167–184. doi: 10.1080/17586801.2012.712875
  23. Grace, A., Kemp, N., Martin, F. H., & Parrila, R. (2014). Undergraduates’ text messaging language and literacy skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27, 855–873. doi: 0.1007/s11145-013-9471-2
  24. Grinter, R. E., & Eldridge, M. (2003). Wan2tlk?: Everyday text messaging. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing System, CHI 2003 (pp. 441–448). Fort Lauderdale, FL, April 5–10 2003. Retrieved from http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~beki/c24.pdf
  25. Gunraj, D. N., Drum-Hewitt, A. M., Dashow, E. M., Upadhyay, S. S. N., & Klin, C. M. (2016). Texting insincerely: The role of the period in text messaging. Computers in Human Behaviour, 55, 1067–1075. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.003
  26. Herring, S. C., & Zelenkauskaite, A. (2009). Symbolic capital in a virtual heterosexual market: Abbreviation and insertion in Italian iTV SMS. Written Communication, 26, 5–31. doi: 10.1177/0741088308327911
  27. Holtgraves, T. (2011). Text messaging, personality, and the social context. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 92–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2010.11.015
  28. International Telecommunication Union (ITU) (2014). ICT facts and figures 2015. Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/stat/default.aspx
  29. Ip, A. (2002). The impact of emoticons on affect interpretation in instant messaging. Retrieved from http://www.amysmile.com/doc/emoticon_paper.pdf
  30. Jessmer, S. L., & Anderson, D. (2001). The effect of politeness and grammar on user perceptions of electronic mail. North American Journal of Psychology, 3, 331–346. Retrieved from http://mydba.lagrana.net/articles/09/ART09.pdf
  31. Kemp, N. (2010). Texting vs. txting: Reading and writing text messages, and links with other linguistic skills. Writing Systems Research, 2, 53–71. doi: 10.1093/wsr/wsq002
  32. Kemp, N., & Bushnell, C. (2011). Children’s text messaging: Abbreviations, input methods and links with literacy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 18–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729. 2010.00400.x
  33. Kemp, N., & Clayton, J. (2016). University students vary their use of textese in digital messages to suit the recipient. Journal of Research in Reading, 40, S141–S157. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817. 12074
  34. Kemp, N., & Grace, A. (2017). Txting across time: Undergraduates’ use of “textese” in seven consecutive first-year psychology cohorts. Writing Systems Research, 9, 82–98. doi: 10.1080/ 17586801.2017.1285220
  35. Kemp, N., Wood, C., & Waldron, S. (2014). do i know its wrong: Children’s and adults’ use of unconventional grammar in text messaging. Reading and Writing, 27, 1585–1602. doi: 10.1007/ s11145-014-9508-1
  36. Lenhart, A. (2015). Teens, social media & technology overview 2015. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/teens-social-media-technology- 2015/
  37. Lewandowski, G., & Harrington, S. (2006). The influence of phonetic abbreviations on evaluation of student performance. Current Research in Social Psychology, 11, 215–226. Retrieved from http://www.uiowa.edu/~grpproc/crisp/crisp11_15.pdf
  38. Ling, R. (2010). Texting as a life phase medium. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15, 277–292. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01520.x
  39. Ling, R., & Baron, N. (2007). Text messaging and IM: Linguistic comparison of American college data. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26, 291–298. doi: 10.1177/0261927X06303480
  40. Lyddy, F., Farina, F., Hanney, J., Farrell, L., & O’Neill, N. K. (2014). An analysis of language in university students’ text messages. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 546–561. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12045
  41. Ouellette, G. & Michaud, M. (2016). Generation Text: Relations among undergraduates’ use of text messaging, textese, and language and literacy skills. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 48, 217–221. doi: 10.1037/cbs0000046
  42. Plester, B., Lerkkanen, M.-K., Linjama, L. J., Rasku-Puttonen, H., & Littleton, K. (2011). Finnish and UK English pre-teen children’s text message language and its relationship with their literacy skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 37–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010. 00402.x
  43. Plester, B., Wood, C., & Bell, V. (2008). Txt msg n school literacy: Does texting and knowledge of text abbreviations adversely affect children’s literacy attainment? Literacy, 42, 137–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-4369.2008.00489.x.
  44. Plester, B., Wood, C., & Joshi, P. (2009). Exploring the relationship between children’s knowledge of text message abbreviations and school literacy outcomes. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 145–161. doi: 10.1348/026151008X320507
  45. Portio (2015). SMS: The language of 6 billion people. Retrieved from http://www.openmarket. com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/OpenMarket-Portio-Research-SMS-the-language-of-6- billion-people.pdf
  46. Province, R. R., Spencer, R. J., & Mandell, D. L. (2007). Emotional expression online: Emoticons punctuate website text messages. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26, 299–307.
  47. Rao, D., Yarowsky, D., Shreevats, A., & Gupta, M. (2010). Classifying latent user attributes in Twitter. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Search and Mining User-Generated Contents. New York: ACM. 37–44. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation. cfm?id=1871993
  48. Rosen, L. D., Chang, J., Erwin, L., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2010). The relationship between “textisms” and formal and informal writing among young adults. Communication Research, 37, 420–440. Doi 10.1177/0093650210362465
  49. Sanchez-Moya, A. & Cruz-Moya, O. (2015). “Hey there! I am using WhatsApp”: A preliminary study of recurrent discursive realisations in a corpus of WhatsApp statuses. Procedia— Social and Behavioral Sciences, 212, 52–60. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.298
  50. cfm?id=1871993
  51. Scott, G. G., Sinclair, J., Short, E., & Bruce, G. (2014). It’s not what you say, it’s how you say it: Language use on Facebook impacts employability but not attractiveness. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(8), 562–566. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2013.0584
  52. Shaw, P. (2008). Spelling, accent and identity in computer-mediated communication. English Today, 24, 42–49. doi: 10.1017/S0266078408000199
  53. Shortis, T. (2001). The language of ICT: Information and communication technology. London: Routledge.
  54. Skovholt, K., Gronning, A., & Kankaanranta, A. (2014). The communicative functions of emoticons in workplace emails::-) Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 19, 780–797. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12063
  55. Squires, L. (2012). Whos punctuating what? Sociolinguistic variation in instant messaging. In A. Jaffe, J. Androutsopoulos, M. Sebba, & S. Johnson (Eds.), Orthography as social action: Scripts, spelling, identity and power (pp. 289–323). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  56. Stephens, K. K., Houser, M. L., & Cowan, R. L. (2009). R U able to meet me: The impact of students’ overly casual email messages to instructors. Communication Education, 58, 303–326. doi: 10.1080/03634520802582598
  57. Tagg, C. (2009). A Corpus Linguistics Study of Text Messaging (Doctoral dissertation). University of Birmingham.
  58. Thurlow, C., & Brown, A. (2003). Generation txt? The sociolinguistics of young people’s textmessaging. Discourse Analysis Online. Retrieved from http://extra.shu.ac.uk/daol/articles/ v1/n1/a3/thurlow2002003.html
  59. Thurlow, C., & Poff, M. (2013). Text messaging. In S. C. Herring, D. Stein, & T. Virtanen (Eds.), Handbook of the pragmatics of CMC (pp. 163–190). New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
  60. Tossell, C. C., Kortum, P., Shepard, C., Barg-Walkow, L. H., Rahmati, A., & Zhong, L. (2012). A longitudinal study of emoticon use in text messaging from smartphones. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 659–663. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.012
  61. Turner, K. H., Abram, S. S., Kat ي c, E., & Donovan, M. J. (2014). Demystifying digital: The what and why of the language teens use in digital writing. Journal of Literacy Research, 46, 157–193. doi: 10.1177/1086296X14534061
  62. Underwood, M. K., Rosen, L. H., More, D., Ehrenreich, S. E., & Gentsch, J. K. (2012). The BlackBerry Project: Capturing the content of adolescents’ text messaging. Developmental Psychology, 48, 295–302. http://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Fa0025914
  63. Varnhagen, C. K., McFall, G. P., Pugh, N., Routledge, L., Sumida-MacDonald, H., & Kwong, T. E. (2010). lol: New language and spelling in instant messaging. Reading and Writing, 23, 719–733. doi: 10.1007/s11145-009-9181-y
  64. Veater, H. M., Plester, B., & Wood, C. (2011). Use of text message abbreviations and literacy skills in children with dyslexia. Dyslexia, 17, 65–71. doi: 10.1002/dys.406
  65. Verheijen, L. (2013). The effects of text messaging and instant messaging on literacy. Journal of English Studies, 94(5), 585–602. doi: 10.1080/0013838X.2013.795737
  66. Vignovic, J. A., & Thompson, L. F. (2010). Computer-mediated cross-cultural collaboration: Attributing communication errors to the person versus the situation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 265–276. doi: 10.1037/a0018628
  67. Wolf, A. (2000). Emotional expression online: Gender differences in emoticon use. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 3, 827–834.
  68. Wood, C., Jackson, E., Hart, L., Plester, B., & Wilde, L. (2011). The effect of text messaging on 9- and 10-year-old children’s reading, spelling and phonological processing skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 28–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00398.x
  69. Wood, C., Kemp, N., & Waldron, S. (2014). Exploring the longitudinal relationships between the use of grammar in text messaging and performance on grammatical tasks. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 32, 415–429. doi 10.1111/bjdp.12049
  70. Wood, C., Kemp, N., Waldron, S., & Hart, L. (2014). Grammatical understanding, literacy and text messaging in school children and undergraduate students: A concurrent analysis. Computers and Education, 70, 281–290. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.003
  71. Wood, C., Meachem, S., Bowyer, S., Jackson, E., Tarczynski-Bowles, M. L., & Plester, B. (2011). A longitudinal study of children’s text messaging and literacy development. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 431–442. doi 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02002.x
سایر مقالات
مروری بر کتاب «درک سواد دیجیتال؛ درآمدی کاربردی»
سه شنبه, ۲۹ آبان ۱۴۰۳
در طراحی فناوری‌های مراقبتی چه الزاماتی را باید در نظر داشت؟
سه شنبه, ۰۹ آذر ۱۴۰۰
هوش مصنوعی چگونه می‌تواند به اختراعات بشری سرعت ببخشد
دوشنبه, ۰۶ بهمن ۱۳۹۹
ایران و قدرت سایبری
سه شنبه, ۰۴ تیر ۱۳۹۸