کتاب‌نامه

1. Abellera, N., Ouano, J., Conway, G., Camilotes, L., & Doctor, H. (2012). The mediating effect of relatedness on Facebook use and self-esteem. International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology 1(3), 59–67.
2. Ahn, J. (2011). The effect of social network sites on adolescents’ social and academic development: Current theories and controversies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62(8), 1435–2882.
3. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Vinitzky, G. (2010). Social network use and personality. Computers in Human Behavior 26(6), 1289–5632.
4. Baker, L. R., & Oswald, D. L. (2010). Shyness and online social networking services. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 27(7), 873–4075.
5. Barker, V. (2009). Older adolescents’ motivations for social network site use: The influence of gender, group identity, and collective self-esteem. Cyberpsychology & Behavior: The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society 12(2), 209–213.
6. Bayer, J. B., Ellison, N. B., Schoenebeck, S. Y., & Falk, E. B. (2016). Sharing the small moments: ephemeral social interaction on Snapchat. Information, Communication and Society 19(7), 956–977.
7. Berndt, T. J. (2002). Friendship quality and social development. Current Directions in Psychological Science 11, 7–10.
8. Blais, J. J., Craig, W. M., Pepler, D., & Connolly, J. (2008). Adolescents online: The importance of Internet activity choices to salient relationships. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 37(5), 522–536.
9. Blight, M. G., Jagiello, K., & Ruppel, E. K. (2015). “Same stuff different day”: A mixed-method study of support seeking on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior 53, 366–373.
10. Boyd, d. (2008). Why youth heart social network sites: The role of networked publics. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 119–142). London: MIT Press.
11. Boyd, d., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(1), Article 11.
12. Brennan, M. (2006). Understanding online social network services and risks to youth. London: Child Exploitation and Online Protection (CEOP) Centre.
13. Brown, B. B. (1990). Peer groups and peer culture. In S. S. Feldman & G. R. Elliott (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 171–196). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Brubaker, J. R., & Hayes, G. R. (2011). We will never forget you [online]: An empirical investigation of post-mortem MySpace comments. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 123–132). New York: ACM.
15. Brubaker, J. R., Hayes, G. R., & Dourish, P. (2013). Beyond the grave: Facebook as a site for the expansion of death and mourning. The Information Society 29(3), 152–163.
16. Buhrmester, D. (1996). Need fulfillment, interpersonal competence and the developmental contexts of early adolescent friendships. In W. M. Bukowski, A. F. Newcomb, & W. W. Hartup (Eds.), The company they keep. Friendship in childhood and adolescence (pp. 158–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Bumgarner, B. A. (2007). You have been poked: Exploring the uses and gratifications of Facebook among emerging adults. First Monday 12(11). Retrieved from http://www.uic.edu
18. Chen, G. M. (2011). Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others. Computers in Human Behavior 27(2), 755–762.
19. Chen, X., Yang, L. H, Toso-Salman, J., Chang, Schear R., & McGoldrick, D. (2016). Social support within online communities: Internet reach and content analysis of a cancer anti-stigma Facebook page in Mexico. Global Media Journal 2016, S1:1
20. Church, S. H. (2013). Digital gravescapes: Digital memorializing on Facebook. The Information Society 29(3), 184–189.
21. Clarke, B. (2009). Friends forever: How young adolescents use social-networking sites. IEEE Intelligent Systems 24(6), 22–26.
22. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology 94, S95–S120.
23. Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & de Zuniga, H. G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior 26(2), 247–253.
24. Coyle, C. L., & Vaughn, H. (2008). Social networking: Communication revolution or evolution? Bell Labs Technical Journal 13(2), 13–17.
25. Deters, F., & Mehl, M. (2012). Does posting Facebook status updates increase or decrease loneliness? An online social networking experiment. Social Psychological and Personality Science 4(5) https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612469233
26. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication 12(4), 1143–1168.
27. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13(6), 873–892.
28. Facebook (n.d.). Facebook About. Retrieved July 21, 2017 from https://www.facebook.com/ pg/facebook/about/
29. Facebook (2017). Facebook newsroom statistics. Retrieved July 21, 2017 from https://newsroom. fb.com/company-info/
30. Green, T., Wilhelmsen, T., Wilmots, E., Dodd, B., & Quinn, S. (2016). Social anxiety, attributes of online communication and self-disclosure across private and public Facebook communication. Computers in Human Behavior 58, 206–213.
31. Greene, J. A., Choudhry, N. K., Kilabuk, E., & Shrank, W. H. (2011). Online social networking by patients with diabetes: a qualitative evaluation of communication with Facebook. Journal of General Internal Medicine 26(3), 287–292.
32. Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009). Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks. Learning, Media and Technology 34(2), 119–140.
33. Grieve, R., Indian, M., Witteveen, K., Anne Tolan, G., & Marrington, J. (2013). Face-to-face or Facebook: Can social connectedness be derived online? Computers in Human Behavior 29(3), 604–609.
34. Hayes, R. A., Carr, C. T., & Wohn, D. Y. (2016). It’s the audience: Differences in social support across social media. Social Media and Society 2(4), 1–12.
35. Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2012). Use of Facebook: A case study of Singapore students’ experience. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 32(2), 181–196.
36. Holtz, B., Smock, A., & Reyes-Gastelum, D. (2015). Connected motherhood: Social support for moms and moms-to-be on Facebook. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health 21(5), 415–421.
37. Joinson, A. (1998). Causes and implications of disinhibited behavior on the Internet. In J. Gackenbach (Ed.), Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications (pp. 43–60). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
38. Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of selfawareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology 31(2), 177–192.
39. Joinson, A. N. (2008). “Looking at”, “looking up”, or “keeping up with” people? Motives and uses of Facebook. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2008 (pp. 1027–1036). Florence, Italy, 5–10 April 2008. New York: ACM.
40. Kaye, B. K. (1998). Uses and gratifications of the World Wide Web: From couch potato to Web potato. The New Jersey Journal of Communication 6(1), 21–40.
41. Kim, J., & Lee, J.-E. R. (2011). The Facebook paths to happiness: Effects of the number of Facebook friends and self-presentation on subjective well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 14(6), 359–364.
42. Kim, Y., Sohn, D., & Choi, S. M. (2011). Cultural difference in motivations for using social network sites: A comparative study of American and Korean college students. Computers in Human Behavior 27(1), 365–372.
43. Kroger, J. (2000). Identity development. Adolescence through adulthood. London: Sage. Lenhart, A., Smith, A., Anderson, M., Duggan, M., & Perrin, A., “Teens, Technology and Friendships.” Pew Research Center, August, 2015. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/06/ teens-technology-and-friendships/
44. Li, X., Chen, W., & Popiel, P. (2015). What happens on Facebook stays on Facebook? The implications of Facebook interaction for perceived, receiving, and giving social support. Computers in Human Behavior 51, 106–113.
45. Lingel, J. (2013). The digital remains: Social media and practices of online grief. The Information Society 29(3), 190–195.
46. Liu, C., & Yu, C. (2013). Can Facebook use induce well-being? Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 16(9), 674–678.
47. Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society 10(3), 393–411.
48. Livingstone, S. (2009). Children and the Internet. Cambridge: Polity Press.
49. Lönnqvist, J.-E., & große Deters, F. (2016). Facebook friends, subjective well-being, social support, and personality. Computers in Human Behavior 55, 113–120.
50. Maccoby, E. E. (2002). Gender and group process: A developmental perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science 11, 54–58.
51. Manago, A. M., Graham, M. B., Greenfield, P. M., & Salimkhan, G. (2008). Self-presentation and gender on MySpace. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 29(6), 446–458.
52. Markow, D. (2006). Friendships in the age of social networking websites. Trends and Tudes. Harris Interactive.
53. Meleshko, K. G., & Alden, L. E. (1993). Anxiety and self-disclosure: Toward a motivational model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64(6), 1000–1009.
54. Mitchell, K. J., & Ybarra, M. (2009). Social networking sites finding a balance between their risks and benefits. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 163(1), 87–89.
55. Morahan-Martin, J., & Schumacher, P. (2003). Loneliness and social uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior 19(6), 659–671.
56. Nabi, R. L., Prestin, A., & So, J. (2013). Facebook friends with (health) benefits? Exploring social network site use and perceptions of social support, stress, and well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 16(10), 721–727.
57. Newcomb, A. F., & Bagwell, C. L. (1996). Developmental significance of friendship. In W. M. Bukowski, A. F. Newcomb, & W. W. Hartup (Eds.), The Company they keep (pp. 289– 321). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. Obar, J., & Wildman, S. (2015). Social media definition and the governance challenge: An introduction to the special issue. Telecommunications Policy 39(9), 745–750.
59. O’Sullivan, B. (2000). What you don’t know won’t hurt me. Human Communication Research 26(3), 403–431.
60. Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A. M. (2000). Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 44(2), 175–196.
61. Park, N., Jin, B., & Jin, S. A. A. (2011). Effects of self-disclosure on relational intimacy on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior 27(5), 1974–1983.
62. Pereira, L. M., Quinn, N., & Morales, E. (2016). Breaking news: “I have an eating disorder.” Video testimonials on YouTube. Computers in Human Behavior 63, 938–942.
63. Pittman, M., & Reich, B. (2016). Social media and loneliness: Why an Instagram picture may be worth more than a thousand Twitter words. Computers in Human Behavior 62, 155–167.
64. Piwek, L., & Joinson, A. (2016). “What do they snapchat about?” Patterns of use in time-limited instant messaging service. Computers in Human Behavior 54, 358–367.
65. Pujazon-Zazik, M., & Park, M. J. (2010). To tweet, or not to tweet: Gender differences and potential positive and negative health outcomes of adolescents’ social Internet use. American Journal of Men’s Health 4(1), 77–85.
66. Quinn, S. & Oldmeadow, J. A. (2012). Is the iGeneration a ‘we’ generation? Social networking use among 9- to 13-year-olds and belonging. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 31(1), 136–142.
67. Quinn, S., & Oldmeadow, J. (2013). The Martini Effect and social networking sites: Early adolescents, mobile social networking and connectedness to friends. Mobile Media & Communication 1(2), 237–247.
68. Reich, S. M. (2010). Adolescents’ sense of community on MySpace and Facebook: A mixedmethods approach. Journal of Community Psychology 38(6), 688–705.
69. Reich, S. M., Subrahmanyam, K., & Espinoza, G. (2012). Friending, IMing, and hanging out face-to-face: Overlap in adolescents’ online and offline social networks. Developmental Psychology 48(2), 356–368.
70. Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M. G., & Orr, R. R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior 25(2), 578–586.
71. Rozzell, B., Piercy, C. W., Carr, C. T., King, S., Lane, B. L., Tornes, M.,… Wright, K. B. (2014). Notification pending: Online social support from close and nonclose relational ties via Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior 38, 272–280.
72. Schlenker, B. R., & Leary, M. R. (1982). Social anxiety and self-presentation: A conceptualization and model. Psychological Bulletin 92(3), 641–669.
73. Schouten, A. P., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Precursors and underlying processes of adolescents’ online self-disclosure: Developing and testing an “Internet-attributeperception” model. Media Psychology 10(2), 292–314.
74. Seidman, G. (2013). Self-presentation and belonging on Facebook: How personality influences social media use and motivations. Personality and Individual Differences 54(3), 402–407.
75. Sheldon, K. M., Abad, N., & Hinsch, C. (2011). A two-way process view of Facebook use and relatedness need-satisfaction: Disconnection drives use and connection rewards it. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 100(4), 766–775.
76. Stafford, T. F., & Gonier, D. (2004). What Americans like about being online. Communications of the ACM 47(11), 107–112.
77. Stafford, T. F., Stafford, M. R., & Schkade, L. L. (2004). Determining uses and gratifications for the Internet. Decision Sciences 35(2), 259–288.
78. Steinfield, C., Ellison, N. B., & Lampe, C. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 29(6), 434–445.
79. Stepanikova, I., Nie, N. H., & He, X. (2010). Time on the Internet at home, loneliness, and life satisfaction: Evidence from panel time-diary data. Computers in Human Behavior 26(3), 329–338.
80. Suler, J. (2005). The online disinhibition effect. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies 2(2), 184–188.
81. Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research 28(3), 317–348.
82. Twitter (2016). Company Facts. Retrieved July 21, 2017 from https://about.twitter.com/company
83. Urista, M. A., Dong, Q., & Day, K. D. (2009). Explaining why young adults use MySpace and Facebook through the uses and gratifications theory. Human Communication Research 12(2), 215–229.
84. Utz, S. (2015). The function of self-disclosure on social network sites: Not only intimate, but also positive and entertaining self-disclosures increase the feeling of connection. Computers in Human Behavior 45, 1–10.
85. Valentine, G., & Holloway, S. L. (2002). Cyberkids? Exploring children’s identities and social networks in on-line and off-line worlds. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92(2), 302–319.
86. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007a). Online communication and adolescent well-being: Testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12(4), Article 2.
87. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007b). Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology 43(2), 267–277.
88. Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Schouten, A. P. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents’ well-being and social self-esteem. Cyberpsychology & Behavior: The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society 9(5), 584–590.
89. Valkenburg, P. M., Schouten, A. P., & Peter, J. (2005). Adolescents’ identity experiments on the Internet. New Media & Society 7(3), 383–402.
90. Valkenburg, P. M., Sumter, S. R., & Peter, J. (2011). Gender differences in online and offline self-disclosure in pre-adolescence and adolescence. The British Journal of Developmental Psychology 29(2), 253–269.
91. Walther, J. B. (1995). Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication—experimental observations over time. Organization Science 6(2), 186–203.
92. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research 23(1), 3–43.
93. Weidman, A. C., Fernandez, K. C., Levinson, C. A., Augustine, A. A., Larsen, R. J., & Rodebaugh, T. L. (2012). Compensatory Internet use among individuals higher in social anxiety and its implications for well-being. Personality and Individual Differences 53(3), 191–195.
94. Wright, K. B. (2012). Emotional support and perceived stress among college students using Facebook.com: An exploration of the relationship between source perceptions and emotional support. Communication Research Reports 29(3), 175–184.
95. Wright, K. B., Rosenberg, J., Egbert, N., Ploeger, N. A., Bernard, D. R., & King, S. (2013). Communication competence, social support, and depression among college students: a model of Facebook and face-to-face support network influence. Journal of Health Communication 18(1), 41–57.
96. Zywica, J., & Danowski, J. (2008). The faces of Facebookers: Investigating social enhancement and social compensation hypotheses; predicting Facebook and offline popularity from sociability and self-esteem, and mapping the meanings of popularity with semantic networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14, 1–34.