خانه » مقالات » فصل نوزدهم: رسانه‌های اجتماعی و کنشگری مجازی
فصل نوزدهم: رسانه‌های اجتماعی و کنشگری مجازی
سه شنبه, ۰۱ مهر ۱۴۰۴
زمان تقریبی مطالعه ۳۲ دقیقه

کتاب‌نامه

  1. Alberici, A. I., & Milesi, P. (2016). Online discussion, politicized identity, and collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 19(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215581430
  2. Alhabash, S., McAlister, A. R., Hagerstrom, A., Quilliam, E. T., Rifon, N. J., & Richards, J. I. (2013). Between likes and shares: Effects of emotional appeal and virality on the persuasiveness of anticyberbullying messages on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 16(3), 175–182.
  3. Bäck, E. A., Bäck, H., & Knapton, H. M. (2015). Group belongingness and collective action: Effects of need to belong and rejection sensitivity on willingness to participate in protest activities. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 56(5), 537–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/ sjop.12225
  4. Bastos, M. T., Mercea, D., & Charpentier, A. (2015). Tents, tweets, and events: The interplay between ongoing protests and social media. Journal of Communication 65(2), 320–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12145
  5. Baumeister, R. F. (2012). Need-to-belong theory. In Paul A. M. Van Lange, Arie W. Kruglanski, & E. Tory Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 121–140). London: Sage.
  6. Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research 49(2), 192–205.
  7. Bishop, J. (Ed.). (2014). Gamification for Human Factors Integration: Social, Education, and Psychological Issues. Hershey: IGI Global.
  8. Brown, M. R., Bhadury, R. K., & Pope, N. K. L. (2010). The impact of comedic violence on viral advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising 39(1), 49–66.
  9. Bruns, A., Highfield, T., & Burgess, J. (2013). The Arab Spring and social media audiences: English and Arabic Twitter users and their networks. American Behavioral Scientist 57(7), 871–898.
  10. Cantarero, K., Gamian-Wilk, M., & Dolinski, D. (2017). Being inconsistent and compliant: The moderating role of the preference for consistency in the door-in-the-face technique. Personality and Individual Differences 115, 54–57.
  11. Carty, V., & Onyett, J. (2006). Protest, cyberactivism and new social movements: The re-emergence of the peace movement post 9/11. Social Movement Studies 5(3), 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742830600991586
  12. Chapman, H., & Coffé, H. (2016). Changing Facebook profile pictures as part of a campaign: Who does it and why? Journal of Youth Studies 19(4), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/1367 6261.2015.1083962
  13. Chiluwa, I., & Ifukor, P. (2015). “War against our children”: Stance and evaluation in #BringBackOurGirls campaign discourse on Twitter and Facebook. Discourse & Society 26(3), 267–296.
  14. Coppock, A., Guess, A., & Ternovski, J. (2016). When treatments are Tweets: A network mobilization experiment over Twitter. Political Behavior 38(1), 105–128. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11109-015-9308-6
  15. Corcoran, K. E., Pettinicchio, D., & Young, J. T. N. (2011). The context of control: A crossnational investigation of the link between political institutions, efficacy, and collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology 50(4), 575–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044- 8309.2011.02076.x
  16. Coyne, I., Chesney, T., Logan, B., & Madden, N. (2009). Griefing in a virtual community. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology 217(4), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1027/ 0044-3409.217.4.214
  17. Darke, P. R., Chaiken, S., Bohner, G., Einwiller, S., Erb, H.-P., & Hazlewood, J. D. (1998). Accuracy motivation, consensus information, and the law of large numbers: Effects on attitude judgment in the absence of argumentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24(11), 1205–1215. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672982411007
  18. De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram influencers: The impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising: The Review of Marketing Communications 36(5), 798–828.
  19. Eckler, P., & Bolls, P. (2011). Spreading the virus: Emotional tone of viral advertising and its effect on forwarding intentions and attitudes. Journal of Interactive Advertising 11(2), 1–11.
  20. Eilperin, J. (2015, May 26). Here’s how the first president of the social media age has chosen to connect with Americans. Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost. com/news/politics/wp/2015/05/26/heres-how-the-first-president-of-the-social-media-agehas-chosen-to-connect-with-americans/
  21. English, K., Sweetser, K. D., & Ancu, M. (2011). YouTube-ification of political talk: An examination of persuasion appeals in viral video. American Behavioral Scientist 55(6), 733–748.
  22. Eshuis, J. (2013). The need to belong. Theory & Psychology 23(3), 404–407.
  23. Feather, N. (2015). Analyzing relative deprivation in relation to deservingness, entitlement and resentment. Social Justice Research 28(1), 7–26.
  24. Gentleman, A. (2016, September 2). Calais refugee camp running out of food amid donor fatigue. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/sep/02/ calais-refugee-camp-running-out-of-food-as-donor-fatigue-sees-donations-dry-up
  25. Guadagno, R. E., & Cialdini, R. B. (2010). Preference for consistency and social influence: A review of current research findings. Social Influence 5(3), 152–163.
  26. Guadagno, R. E., Rempala, D. M., Murphy, S., & Okdie, B. M. (2013). What makes a video go viral? An analysis of emotional contagion and Internet memes. Computers in Human Behavior 29(6), 2312–2319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.016
  27. Klein, O., Spears, R., & Reicher, S. (2007). Social identity performance: Extending the strategic side of SIDE. Personality and Social Psychology Review 11(1), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1088868306294588
  28. Korolov, R., Lu, D., Wang, J., Zhou, G., Bonial, C., Voss, C.,… Ji, H. (2016). On predicting social unrest using social media. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining ASONAM 2016 (pp. 89–95), 18–21 August, San Francisco, CA, Piscataway: IEEE.
  29. Krishnan, A., & Hunt, D. S. (2015). Influence of a multidimensional measure of attitudes on motives to use social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 18(3), 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0423
  30. Kristofferson, K., White, K., & Peloza, J. (2014). The nature of slacktivism: How the social observability of an initial act of token support affects subsequent prosocial action. Journal of Consumer Research 40(6), 1149–1166. https://doi.org/10.1086/674137
  31. Lea, M., Spears, R., & de Groot, D. (2001). Knowing me, knowing you: Anonymity effects on social identity processes within groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27(5), 526–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201275002
  32. Lee, E., Lee, J.-A., Moon, J. H., & Sung, Y. (2015). Pictures speak louder than words: Motivations for using Instagram. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 18(9), 552–556. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0157
  33. Lee, E.-J. (2004). Effects of visual representation on social influence in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research 30(2), 234–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1468-2958.2004.tb00732.x
  34. Lee, E.-J. (2008). When are strong arguments stronger than weak arguments: Deindividuation effects on message elaboration in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research 35(5), 646–665. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208321784
  35. Lee, J., Ham, C.-D., & Kim, M. (2013). Why people pass along online video advertising: From the perspectives of the interpersonal communication motives scale and the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Interactive Advertising 13(1), 1–13.
  36. Lee, J. K., & Kim, E. (2017). Incidental exposure to news: Predictors in the social media setting and effects on information gain online. Computers in Human Behavior 75, 1008–1015.
  37. Leonard, D. J., Moons, W. G., Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (2011). “We’re mad as hell and we’re not going to take it anymore”: Anger self-stereotyping and collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 14(1), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210373779
  38. Linder, C., Myers, J. S., Riggle, C., & Lacy, M. (2016). From margins to mainstream: Social media as a tool for campus sexual violence activism. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 9(3), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000038
  39. Lindgren, S., & Lundström, R. (2011). Pirate culture and hacktivist mobilization: The cultural and social protocols of #WikiLeaks on Twitter. New Media & Society 13(6), 999–1018.
  40. Loss, J., Lindacher, V., & Curbach, J. (2014). Online social networking sites—A novel setting for health promotion? Health & Place 26, 161–170.
  41. Lotan, G., Graeff, E., Ananny, M., Gaffney, D., Pearce, I., & boyd, d. (2011). The Arab Spring| the revolutions were tweeted: Information flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions. International Journal of Communication 5, 31.
  42. Luchman, J. N., Bergstrom, J., & Krulikowski, C. (2014). A motives framework of social media website use: A survey of young Americans. Computers in Human Behavior 38, 136–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.016
  43. Peuchaud, S. (2014). Social media activism and Egyptians’ use of social media to combat sexual violence: An HiAP case study. Health Promotion International 29(Suppl. 1), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dau046
  44. Phua, J., Jin, S. V., & Hahm, J. M. (2018). Celebrity-endorsed e-cigarette brand Instagram advertisements: Effects on young adults’ attitudes towards e-cigarettes and smoking intentions. Journal of Health Psychology 23(4), 550–560.
  45. Pillow, D. R., Malone, G. P., & Hale, W. J. (2015). The need to belong and its association with fully satisfying relationships: A tale of two measures. Personality and Individual Differences 74, 259–264.
  46. Postmes, T., & Brunsting, S. (2002). Collective action in the age of the Internet: Mass communication and online mobilization. Social Science Computer Review 20(3), 290–301.
  47. Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1998). Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDEeffects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research 25(6), 689–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365098025006006
  48. Powell, A. (2016). Hacking in the public interest: Authority, legitimacy, means, and ends. New Media & Society 18(4), 600–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816629470
  49. Rodrigues, L., & Girandola, F. (2017). Self-prophecies and cognitive dissonance: Habit, norms and justification of past behavior. North American Journal of Psychology 19(1), 65–86.
  50. Rossolatos, G. (2015). The ice-bucket challenge: The legitimacy of the memetic mode of cultural reproduction is the message. Signs and Society 3(1), 132–152.
  51. Saab, R., Tausch, N., Spears, R., & Cheung, W.-Y. (2015). Acting in solidarity: Testing an extended dual pathway model of collective action by bystander group members. British Journal of Social Psychology 54(3), 539–560. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12095
  52. de la Sablonnière, R., Tougas, F., Taylor, D. M., Crush, J., McDonald, D., & Perenlei, O. R. (2015). Social change in Mongolia and South Africa: The impact of relative deprivation trajectory and group status on well-being and adjustment to change. Social Justice Research 28(1), 102–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-015-0236-8
  53. Sassenberg, K., & Boos, M. (2003). Attitude change in computer-mediated communication: Effects of anonymity and category norms. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 6(4), 405–422.
  54. Schaffar, W. (2016). New social media and politics in Thailand: The emergence of fascist vigilante groups on Facebook. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies 9(2), 215.
  55. Schumann, S., & Klein, O. (2015). Substitute or stepping stone? Assessing the impact of lowthreshold online collective actions on offline participation. European Journal of Social Psychology 45(3), 308–322. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2084
  56. Scott, K. (2015). The pragmatics of hashtags: Inference and conversational style on Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics 81, 8–20.
  57. Selim, H. A., Long, K. M., & Vignoles, V. L. (2014). Exploring identity motives in Twitter usage in Saudi Arabia and the UK. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 199, 128–132.
  58. Sheldon, P., & Bryant, K. (2016). Instagram: Motives for its use and relationship to narcissism and contextual age. Computers in Human Behavior 58, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.chb.2015.12.059
  59. Shugerman, E. (2017, October 17). All you need to know about the MeToo campaign and how it started. The Independent. Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/ americas/me-too-facebook-hashtag-why-when-meaning-sexual-harassment-rape-storiesexplained- a8005936.html
  60. Smith, H. J., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2014). The subjective interpretation of inequality: A model of the relative deprivation experience. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 8(12), 755–765. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12151
  61. Spears, R., Lea, M., Corneliussen, R. A., Postmes, T., & Haar, W. T. (2002). Computer-mediated communication as a channel for social resistance: The strategic side of SIDE. Small Group Research 33(5), 555–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649602237170
  62. Sweeney, P. D., McFarlin, D. B., & Inderrieden, E. J. (1990). Using relative deprivation theory to explain satisfaction with income and pay level: A multi-study examination. Academy of Management Journal 33(2), 423–436.
  63. Teppers, E., Luyckx, K., A. Klimstra, T., & Goossens, L. (2014). Loneliness and Facebook motives in adolescence: A longitudinal inquiry into directionality of effect. Journal of Adolescence 37(5), 691–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.11.003
  64. Thomas, E. F., & Louis, W. R. (2014). When will collective action be effective? Violent and non-violent protests differentially influence perceptions of legitimacy and efficacy among sympathizers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 40(2), 263–276. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0146167213510525
  65. Thomas, E. F., & McGarty, C. A. (2009). The role of efficacy and moral outrage norms in creating the potential for international development activism through group-based interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology 48(1), 115–134.
  66. Thomas, E. F., Rathmann, L., & McGarty, C. (2017). From “I” to “We”: Different forms of identity, emotion, and belief predict victim support volunteerism among nominal and active supporters. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 47(4), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/ jasp.12428
  67. Tufekci, Z., & Wilson, C. (2012). Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication 62(2), 363–379. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01629.x
  68. Tyler, J. M., Branch, S. E., & Kearns, P. O. (2016). Dispositional need to belong moderates the impact of negative social cues and rejection on self-esteem. Social Psychology 47(4), 179–186.
  69. Valenzuela, S. (2013). Unpacking the use of social media for protest behavior: The roles of information, opinion expression, and activism. American Behavioral Scientist 57(7), 920–942. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479375
  70. Valeriani, A., & Vaccari, C. (2016). Accidental exposure to politics on social media as online participation equalizer in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. New Media & Society 18(9), 1857–1874. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815616223
  71. van den Bos, K., van Veldhuizen, T. S., & Au, A. K. (2015). Counter cross-cultural priming and relative deprivation: The role of individualism–collectivism. Social Justice Research 28(1), 52–75.
  72. van Noort, G., Antheunis, M. L., & van Reijmersdal, E. A. (2012). Social connections and the persuasiveness of viral campaigns in social network sites: Persuasive intent as the underlying mechanism. Journal of Marketing Communications, 18(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/135 27266.2011.620764
  73. Van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A. H., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87(5), 649.
  74. Veenstra, A. S., Iyer, N., Hossain, M. D., & Park, J. (2014). Time, place, technology: Twitter as an information source in the Wisconsin labor protests. Computers in Human Behavior 31, 65–72.
  75. Velasquez, A., & LaRose, R. (2015). Social media for social change: Social media political efficacy and activism in student activist groups. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 59(3), 456–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1054998
  76. Vignoles, V. L. (2011). Identity motives. In Seth J. Schwartz, Koen Luyckx, & Vivian L. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 403–432). New York: Springer.
  77. Vissers, S., Hooghe, M., Stolle, D., & Maheo, V.-A. (2012). The impact of mobilization media on off-line and online participation: Are mobilization effects medium-specific? Social Science Computer Review 30(2), 152–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439310396485
  78. Vraga, E. K., Bode, L., Wells, C., Driscoll, K., & Thorson, K. (2014). The rules of engagement: Comparing two social protest movements on YouTube. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 17(3), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2013.0117
  79. Warren, A. M., Sulaiman, A., & Jaafar, N. I. (2014). Facebook: The enabler of online civic engagement for activists. Computers in Human Behavior 32, 284–289.
  80. Woo, H., Kim, Y., & Dominick, J. (2004). Hackers: Militants or merry pranksters? A content analysis of defaced web pages. Media Psychology 6(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1207/ s1532785xmep0601_3
  81. Xu, W. W., Park, J. Y., Kim, J. Y., & Park, H. W. (2016). Networked cultural diffusion and creation
  82. on YouTube: An analysis of YouTube memes. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 60(1), 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1127241
  83. Yang, C., & Brown, B. B. (2013). Motives for using Facebook, patterns of Facebook activities, and late adolescents’ social adjustment to college. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 42(3), 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9836-x
  84. Yang, H. C., & Wang, Y. (2015). Social sharing of online videos: Examining American consumers’ video sharing attitudes, intent, and behavior. Psychology & Marketing 32(9), 907–919. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20826
سایر مقالات
پیامدهای اکتفا به فضای مجازی در مشارکت سیاسی
یکشنبه, ۰۹ خرداد ۱۴۰۰
زندگی و چالش‌های غیر قابل پیش‌بینی آن
چرا رایانه‌ها در پیش‌بینی موفقیت تحصیلی کودکان شکست می‌خورند؟
دوشنبه, ۱۰ شهریور ۱۴۰۴
اگر قرار است بشریت در فضا موفق شود، اخلاق ما نیز باید تکامل یابد (بخش دوم)
یکشنبه, ۰۱ خرداد ۱۴۰۱
حمایت حقوقی از دارایی‌های نوظهور در عصر متاورس
چهار شنبه, ۰۳ خرداد ۱۴۰۲