کتاب‌نامه

1. Abramova, O., Baumann, A., Krasnova, H., & Buxmann, P. (2016). Gender differences in online dating: What do we know so far? A systematic literature review. In (HICSS) 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3858–3867). 5–8 January, Koloa, HI. Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates.
2. Aretz, W., Demuth, I., Schmidt, K., & Vierlein, J. (2010). Partner search in the digital age: Psychological characteristics of online-dating-service-users and its contribution to the explanation of different patterns of utilization. Journal of Business and Media Psychology 1(1), 8–16.
3. Attrill, A. (Ed.). (2015). Cyberpsychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Attrill, A., Fullwood, C., & Chadwick, C. (2015). Catfish: The detection of red flags, dangers and suspicious behaviours in the pursuit of love online. Paper presented at the Social Networking in Cyberspace Conference. 3–4 September, Wolverhampton, UK.
5. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin 117(3), 497–529.
6. Bergstrom, M. (2011). Casual dating online: Sexual norms and practices on French heterosexual dating sites. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung 23(3), 319–336.
7. Billedo, C. J., Kerkhof, P., & Finkenauer, C. (2015). The use of social networking sites for relationship maintenance in long-distance and geographically close romantic relationships. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 18(3), 152–157.
8. Blackwell, C., Birnholtz, J., & Abbott, C. (2015). Seeing and being seen: Co-situation and impression formation using Grindr, a location-aware gay dating app. New Media & Society 17(7), 1117–1136.
9. Brem, M. J., Spiller, L. C., & Vandehey, M. A. (2015). Online mate-retention tactics on Facebook are associated with relationship aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 30(16), 2831–2850.
10. Bryant, K., & Sheldon, P. (2017). Cyber dating in the age of mobile apps: Understanding motives, attitudes, and characteristics of users. American Communication Journal 19(2), 1–15.
11. Cacioppo, J. T., Cacioppo, S., Gonzaga, G. C., Ogburn, E. L., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2013). Marital satisfaction and break-ups differ across on-line and off-line meeting venues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(25), 10135–10140.
12. Chan, M. (2015). Mobile phones and the good life: Examining the relationships among mobile use, social capital and subjective well-being. New Media & Society 17(1), 96–113.
13. Chan, L. S. (2017). Who uses dating apps? Exploring the relationships among trust, sensationseeking, smartphone use, and the intent to use dating apps based on the Integrative Model. Computers in Human Behavior 72, 246–258.
14. Cooper, A., & Sportolari, L. (1997). Romance in cyberspace: Understanding online attraction. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy 22(1), 7–14.
15. Craft, S., & Garcia, Y. E. (2016). Interpersonal media used by couples in non-proximal romantic relationships: Implications for psychological practice. In S. Y. Tettegah & Y. E. Garcia (Eds.), Emotions, technology, and health (pp. 211–224). London, UK: Academic Press.
16. Crowcroft, J., Wolisz, A., & Sathiaseelan, A. (2015). Towards an affordable Internet access for everyone: The quest for enabling universal service commitment (Dagstuhl seminar 14471). Dagstuhl Reports 4(11). doi:10.4230/DagRep.4.11.78
17. Dahlgreen, W. (2016). A third of under-40s have used Internet dating. Retrieved from https:// yougov.co.uk/news/2016/02/16/one-three-under-40s-have-used-internet-dating
18. Dainton, M., & Stokes, A. (2015). College students’ romantic relationships on Facebook: Linking the gratification for maintenance to Facebook maintenance activity and the experience of jealousy. Communication Quarterly 63(4), 365–383.
19. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behaviour. Psychological Inquiry 11(4), 227–268.
20. Desai, N. G., Jha, S., Choudhury, A., & Garg, B. (2018). Internet infidelity: Interface with mental health. In S. P. Sahni & G. Jain (Eds.), Internet Infidelity (pp. 147–156). Singapore: Springer.
21. Duck, S. W. (1982). A topography of relationship disengagement and dissolution. In S. W. Duck & R. Gilmour (Eds.), Personal Relationships: Dissolving Personal Relationships, Vol. 4. London, UK: Academic Press.
22. Duck, S. W. (1998). Human Relationships, 3rd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23. Dutton, W., & Blank, G. (2014). Cultures of the Internet: Five clusters of attitudes and beliefs among users in Britain. In L. Robinson, S. R. Cotten, J. Schulz, T. M. Hale, & A. Williams (Eds.), Communication and Information Technologies Annual (Studies in Media and Communications Series, Volume 10) (pp. 3–28). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
24. Ellison, N. B., Hancock, J. T., & Toma, C. L. (2012). Profile as promise: A framework for conceptualizing veracity in online dating self-presentations. New Media & Society 14(1), 45–62
25. Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., Karney, B. R., Reis, H. T., & Sprecher, S. (2012). Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 13(1), 3–66.
26. Fox, J., & Warber, K. M. (2014). Social networking sites in romantic relationships: Attachment, uncertainty, and partner surveillance on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 17(1), 3–7.
27. Fullwood, C., & Attrill-Smith, A. (2018). Up-dating: Ratings of perceived dating success are better online than offline. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 21(1), 11–15.
28. Gatter, K., & Hodkinson, K. (2016). On the differences between Tinder™ versus online dating agencies: Questioning a myth. An exploratory study. Cogent Psychology 3(1), 1162414.
29. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
30. Goodman-Deane, J., Mieczakowski, A., Johnson, D., Goldhaber, T., & Clarkson, P. J. (2016).
31. The impact of communication technologies on life and relationship satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior 57, 219–229.
32. Hamilton, N. F. (2016). Romantic relationships and online dating. In A. Attrill & C. Fullwood (Eds.), Applied cyberpsychology (pp. 144–160). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
33. Hampton, A. J., Rawlings, J., Treger, S., & Sprecher, S. (2017). Channels of computer-mediated communication and satisfaction in long-distance relationships. Interpersona 11(2), 171.
34. Hance, M. A., Blackhart, G., & Dew, M. (2017). Free to be me: The relationship between the true self, rejection sensitivity, and use of online dating sites. The Journal of Social Psychology 158(4), 421–429.
35. Hancock, J. T., Toma, C., & Ellison, N. (2007, 30 April–3 May). The truth about lying in online dating profiles. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 449–452). San Jose, California. New York: ACM.
36. Hancock, J. T., & Toma, J. T. (2009). Putting your best face forward: The accuracy of online dating photographs. Journal of Communication 59, 367–386.
37. Harrison, K. (2017). “Relive the passion, find your affair”. Revising the infidelity script online. Convergence [online]. doi:10.1177/1354856517725987.
38. Haupert, M. L., Gesselman, A. N., Moors, A. C., Fisher, H. E., & Garcia, J. R. (2017). Prevalence of experiences with consensual non-monogamous relationships: Findings from two national samples of single Americans. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy 43(5), 424–440.
39. Heino, R. D., Ellison, N. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2010). Relationshopping: Investigating the market metaphor in online dating. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 27(4), 427–447.
40. Henry-Waring, M., & Barraket, J. (2008). Dating & intimacy in the 21st century: The use of online dating sites in Australia. International Journal of Emerging Technologies & Society 6(1).
41. Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review 94(3), 319.
42. Hitsch, G. J., Hortaçsu, A., & Ariely, D. (2010). Matching and sorting in online dating. American Economic Review 100(1), 130–163.
43. Huber, G. A., & Malhotra, N. (2017). Political homophily in social relationships: Evidence from online dating behavior. The Journal of Politics 79(1), 269–283.
44. Janning, M., Gao, W., & Snyder, E. (2018). Constructing shared “space”: Meaningfulness in long-distance romantic relationship communication formats. Journal of Family Issues 39(5), 1281–1303
45. Johnson, K., Vilceanu, M. O., & Pontes, M. C. (2017). Use of online dating websites and dating apps: Findings and implications for LGB populations. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness 11(3), 60–66.
46. Jung, J., Bapna, R., Ramaprasad, J., & Umyarov, A. (2018, forthcoming). Love Unshackled: Identifying the Effect of Mobile App Adoption in Online Dating. MIS Quarterly.
47. Khan, K. S., & Chaudhry, S. (2015). An evidence-based approach to an ancient pursuit: Systematic review on converting online contact into a first date. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine 20(2) [online]. Retrieved from https://ebm.bmj.com/content/20/2/48
48. Kim, M., Kwon, K. N., & Lee, M. (2009). Psychological characteristics of Internet dating service users: The effect of self-esteem, involvement, and sociability on the use of Internet dating services. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 12(4), 445–449.
49. Lapidot-Lefler, N., & Barak, A. (2015). The benign online disinhibition effect: Could situational factors induce self-disclosure and prosocial behaviors? Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 9(2).
50. Lemke, R., & Weber, M. (2017). That man behind the curtain: Investigating the sexual online dating behavior of men who have sex with men but hide their same-sex sexual attraction in offline surroundings. Journal of Homosexuality 64(11), 1561–1582.
51. Lever, J., Grov, C., Royce, T. G., & Gillespie, B. J. (2008). Searching for love in all the “write” places: Exploring Internet personals use by sexual orientation, gender, and age. International Journal of Sexual Health 20, 233–246.
52. Li, N. P., Yong, J. C., Tov, W., Sng, O., Fletcher, G. J., Valentine, K. A.,… Balliet, D. (2013). Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 105(5), 757.
53. Lomanowska, A. M., & Guitton, M. J. (2016). Online intimacy and well-being in the digital age. Internet Interventions 4, 138–144.
54. Madden, M. and Lenhart, A. (2006). Online dating: Americans who are seeking romance use the Internet to help them in their search, but there is still widespread public concern about the safety of online dating. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
55. Manning, J., & Bloedel, A. (2017). Exploring polyamory online: Ethics, relationships and understanding.In P. G. Nixon and I. K. Düsterh ِ ft (Eds.), Sex in the Digital Age (pp. 158–167). New York, NY: Routledge.
56. Martins, A., Pereira, M., Andrade, R., Dattilio, F. M., Narciso, I., & Canavarro, M. C. (2016). Infidelity in dating relationships: Gender-specific correlates of face-to-face and online extradyadic
57. Archives of Sexual Behavior 45(1), 193–205.
58. Mazur, E. (2017). Diverse disabilities and dating online. In M. F. Wrights (Ed.), Identity, sexuality, and relationships among emerging adults in the digital age (pp. 150–167). IGI Global.
59. Murray, C. E., & Campbell, E. C. (2015). The pleasures and perils of technology in intimate relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy 14(2), 116–140.
60. Pettigrew, J. (2009). Text messaging and connectedness within close interpersonal relationships. Marriage & Family Review 45(6–8), 697–716.
61. Rabby, M. K. (2007). Relational maintenance and the influence of commitment in online and offline relationships. Communication Studies 58(3), 315–337.
62. Rosenfeld, M. J., & Thomas, R. J. (2012). Searching for a mate: The rise of the Internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review 77(4), 523–547.
63. Sahni, S. P., & Jain, G. (2018). An overview: Internet infidelity. In S. P. Sahni & G. Jain (Eds.), Internet Infidelity (pp. 1–12). Singapore: Springer.
64. Schade, L. C., Sandberg, J., Bean, R., Busby, D., & Coyne, S. (2013). Using technology to connect in romantic relationships: Effects on attachment, relationship satisfaction, and stability in emerging adults. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy 12, 314–338.
65. Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonalrelations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
66. Sevi, B., Aral, T., & Eskenazi, T. (2017). Exploring the hook-up app: Low sexual disgust and high sociosexuality predict motivation to use Tinder for casual sex. Personality and Individual Differences 33, 17–20.
67. Shaughnessy, K., Fudge, M., & Byers, E. S. (2017). An exploration of prevalence, variety, and frequency data to quantify online sexual activity experience. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality 26(1), 60–75.
68. Skopek, J., Schulz, F., & Blossfeld, H. P. (2009). Partnersuche im Internet. KZfSS K ِ lner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 61(2), 183–210.
69. Skopek, J., Schulz, F., & Blossfeld, H. P. (2010). Who contacts whom? Educational homophily in online mate selection. European Sociological Review 27(2), 180–195.
70. Smith, A. W., & Duggan, M. (2013). Online Dating & Relationships. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
71. Stephure, R. J., Boon, S. D., MacKinnon, S. L., & Deveau, V. L. (2009). Internet-initiated relationships: Associations between age and involvement in online dating. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14(3), 658–681.
72. Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 7(3), 321–326.
73. Sumter, S. R., Vandenbosch, L., & Ligtenberg, L. (2017). Love me Tinder: Untangling emerging adults’ motivations for using the dating application Tinder. Telematics and Informatics 34(1), 67–78.
74. Swann, Jr, W. B. (1990). To be adored or to be known? The interplay of self-enhancement and self-verification. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior, Vol. 2 (pp. 408–448). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
75. Thompson, A. E., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2016). Drawing the line: The development of a comprehensive assessment of infidelity judgments. The Journal of Sex Research 53(8), 910–926.
76. Timmermans, E., & De Caluwé, E. (2017a). Development and validation of the Tinder Motives Scale (TMS). Computers in Human Behavior 70, 341–350.
77. Timmermans, E., & De Caluwé, E. (2017b). To Tinder or not to Tinder, that’s the question: An individual differences perspective to Tinder use and motives. Personality and Individual Differences 110, 74–79.
78. Tong, S. T., Hancock, J. T., and Slatcher, R. B. (2016). Online dating system design and relational decision making: Choice, algorithms, and control. Personal Relationship 23(4), 645–662.
79. Utz, S., & Beukeboom, C. J. (2011). The role of social network sites in romantic relationships: Effects on jealousy and relationship happiness. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 16(4), 511–527.
80. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Who visits online dating sites? Exploring some characteristics of online daters. CyberPsychology & Behavior 10(6), 849–852.
81. Vossler, A. (2016). Internet infidelity 10 years on: A critical review of the literature. The Family Journal 24(4), 359–366.
82. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research 23, 3–43.
83. Walther, J. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior 23(5), 2538–2557.
84. Weiser, D. A., Niehuis, S., Flora, J., Punyanunt-Carter, N. M., Arias, V. S., & Baird, R. H. (2017). Swiping right: Sociosexuality, intentions to engage in infidelity, and infidelity experiences on Tinder. Personality and Individual Differences 133, 29–33.
85. Whitty, M. (2007). Love Letters. The development of romantic relationships through the ages. In Joinson, A. (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology (pp. 31–42). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
86. Wu, P.-L., & Chiou, W.-B. (2009). More options lead to more searching and worse choices in finding partners for romantic relationships online: An experimental study. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 12, 315–318.