خانه » مقالات » فصل ششم: افسانۀ بومیان دیجیتال و معنای آن برای آموزش عالی
فصل ششم: افسانۀ بومیان دیجیتال و معنای آن برای آموزش عالی
سه شنبه, ۰۱ مهر ۱۴۰۴
زمان تقریبی مطالعه ۱۹ دقیقه

کتاب‌نامه

  1. (2012). “National Assessment Program ICT Literacy: Years 6 and 10 Report 2011.” ACARA. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu.au/verve/_resources/NAP_ICTL_2011_Public_Report_Final.pdf.
  2. Akçayır, M., Dündar, H., & Akçayır, G. (2016). What makes you a digital native? Is it enough to be born after 1980? Computers in Human Behavior 60, 435–440.
  3. Apps, T. (2015). ICT Literacy and the digital divide: Understanding primary students’ ICT practices and possibilities (Doctoral dissertation). University of Wollongong.
  4. Beckman, K. (2015). Secondary school students’ technology practices in their everyday lives and at school (Doctoral dissertation). University of Wollongong.
  5. Beckman, K., Bennett, S., & Lockyer, L. (2014). Understanding students’ use and value of technology for learning. Learning, Media and Technology 39(3), 346–367. doi:10.1080/17439 884.2013.878353.
  6. Bekebrede, G., Warmelink, H. J. G., & Myer, I. S. (2011). Reviewing the need for gaming in education to accommodate the net generation. Computers & Education 57(2), 1521–1529.
  7. Bennett, S. (2014). Conceptualising technology use as social practice to research student experiences of technology in higher education. In Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2014 (pp. 2567–2572). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  8. Bennett, S., & Corrin, L. (2017). From digital natives to student experiences with technology. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology (pp. 2512–2520). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-2255-3.
  9. Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The “digital natives” debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology 39(5), 775–786.
  10. Bird, J., and Edwards, S. (2015). Children learning to use technologies through play: A digital play framework. British Journal of Educational Technology 46(6), 1149–1160. doi:10.1111/ bjet.12191.
  11. Buckingham, D. (2008). Defining digital literacy: What do young people need to know about digital media? In C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Eds.), Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies and Practices (pp. 73–90). New York: Peter Lang.
  12. Buckingham, D. (2013). Beyond Technology: Children’s Learning in the Age of Digital Culture. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  13. Coldwell-Neilson, J. (2017). Assumed digital literacy knowledge by Australian universities: Are students informed? In Proceedings of the Nineteenth Australasian Computing Education Conference (pp. 75–80). New York: ACM.
  14. Corrin, L., Bennett, S., & Lockyer, L. (2013). Digital natives: Exploring the diversity of young people’s experience with technology, In R. Huang, Kinshuk, & J. M. Spector (Eds.), Reshaping learning: The frontiers of learning technologies in global context (pp. 113–138). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  15. Corrin, L., Lockyer, L., & Bennett, S. (2010). Technological diversity: An investigation of students’technology use in everyday life and academic study. Learning, Media and Technology 35(4), 387–401.
  16. Cotten, S. R., Hale, T. M., Moroney, M. H., O’Neal, L., & Borch, C. (2011). Using affordable technology to decrease digital inequality: Results from Birmingham’s One Laptop Per Child XO Laptop Project. Information, Communication & Society 14(4), 424–444. doi:10.1080/136 9118X.2011.559266. 884.2013.878353.
  17. Danby, S., Davidson, C., Theobald, M., Scriven, B., Cobb-Moore, C., Houen, S.,… Thorpe, K. (2013). Talk in activity during young children’s use of digital technologies at home. Australian Journal of Communication 40(2), 83.
  18. Dohn, N. B. (2009). Web 2.0: Inherent tensions and evident challenges for education. International journal of computer-supported collaborative learning, 4(3), 343–363. doi:10.1007/ s11412-009-9066-8.
  19. Ellis, R. A., Bliuc, A., & Goodyear, P. (2012). Student experiences of engaged enquiry in pharmacy education: Digital natives or something else? Higher Education 64(5), 609–626.
  20. Eynon, R., & Malmberg, L.-E. (2012). Understanding the online information-seeking behaviours of young people: The role of networks of support: Online information-seeking behaviours. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 28(6), 514–529. doi:10.1111/j.1365–2729.2011.00460.x.
  21. Eynon, R., & Malmberg, L.-E. (2011). A typology of young people’s Internet use: Implications for education. Computers & Education 56(3), 585–595. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.020.
  22. Ferri, P., & Pozzali, A. (2012). University students and social media: Reflections from an empirical research. Journal of Universal Computer Science 18(3), 377–392.
  23. Garcia, P., & Qin, J. (2007). Identifying the generation gap in higher education. Innovate 3(4). Retrieved from http://innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=379.
  24. Goodyear, P. (2015). Teaching as design. HERDSA Review of Higher Education 2, 27–50.
  25. Gros, B., Garcia, I., & Escofet, A. (2012). Beyond the net generation debate: A comparison of digital learners in face-to-face and virtual universities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 13(4), 190–210.
  26. Gurung, B., and Rutledge, D. (2014). Digital learners and the overlapping of their personal and educational digital engagement. Computers & Education 77, 91–100. doi:10.1016/j. compedu.2014.04.012.
  27. Hollingworth, S., Mansaray, A., Allen, K., & Rose, A. (2011). Parents’ perspectives on technology and children’s learning in the home: Parents, social class and the role of the habitus. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 27(4), 347–360. doi:10.1111/j.1365–2729.2011. 00431.x.
  28. Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York: Vintage.
  29. Inan, F. A., Lowther, D. L., Ross, S. M., & Strahl, D. (2010). Pattern of classroom activities during students’ use of computers: Relations between instructional strategies and computer applications. Teaching and Teacher Education 26(3), 540–546. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.017.
  30. Jones, C., & Healing, G. (2010). Networks and locations for student learning. Learning, Media and Technology 35(4), 369–385.
  31. Jones, C., & Shao, B. (2011). The net generation and digital natives: Implications for higher education. York: Higher Education Academy.
  32. Judd, T., & Kennedy, G. (2011). Measurement and evidence of computer-based task switching and multitasking by “Net Generation” students. Computers & Education 56(3), 625–631.
  33. Kennedy, G., Krause, K., Gray, K., Judd, T., Bennett, S., Maton, K.,… Bishop, A. (2006). Questioning the Net Generation: A collaborative project in Australian higher education. In L. Markauskaite, P. Goodyear, & P. Reimann (Eds.), Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 413–417). Sydney: Sydney University Press.
  34. Kirschner, P. A., & De Bruyckere, P. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education 67, 135–142.
  35. Kvavik, R. B., Caruso, J. B., & Morgan, G. (2004). ECAR study of students and information technology 2004: Convenience, connection, and control. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research.
  36. Lankshear, C., and Knobel, M. (2015). Digital literacy and digital literacies: Policy, pedagogy and research considerations for education. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy 9, 8–20.
  37. Livingstone, S., Bober, M., & Helsper, E. (2005). Internet literacy among children and young people: Findings from the UK Children Go Online Project. OFCOM/ESRC, London, UK.
  38. Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., س lafsson, K., & Haddon, L. (2014). Children’s online risks and opportunities: Comparative findings from EU Kids Online and Net Children Go Mobile. Retrieved from https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/60513/1/__lse.ac.uk_storage_LIBRARY_Secondary_libfile_shared_repository_Content_EU%20Kids%20Online_EU%20Kids%20Online- Children%27s%20online%20risks_2014.pdf
  39. Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education 56(2), 429–440.
  40. Newman, T., & Beetham, H. (2017). Student digital experience tracker 2017: The voice of 22,000 UK learners. Bristol: JISC. Retrieved from https://repository.jisc.ac.uk/6662/1/pdf
  41. (2010). Are the new millennium learners making the grade? Educational Research and Innovation. OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264076044-en.
  42. (2015). Students, Computers and Learning. PISA. OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/ 9789264239555-en.
  43. Plowman, L. (2016). Learning technology at home and preschool. In N. Rushby & D. W. Surry (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook of Learning Technology (pp. 96–112). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  44. Plowman, L., & Stephen, C. (2007). Guided interaction in pre-school settings. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 23(1), 14–26. doi:10.1111/j.1365–2729.2007.00194.x.
  45. Plowman, L., Stephen, C., & McPake, J. (2010). Supporting young children’s learning with technology at home and in preschool. Research Papers in Education 25(1), 93–113. doi:10.1080/02671520802584061.
  46. Prescott, J., Wilson, S., & Becket, G. (2013). Facebook use in the learning environment: Do students want this? Learning, Media and Technology 38(3), 345–350.
  47. Robinson, L., & Schulz, J. (2013). Net time negotiations within the family” Information, Communication & Society 16(4), 542–560. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.777761.
  48. Selwyn, N. (2002). Defining the “digital divide”: Developing a theoretical understanding of inequalities in the information age. Cardiff: Cardiff University.
  49. Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: Notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 26, 65–73.
  50. Selwyn, N., Potter, J., & Cranmer, S. (2009). Primary pupils’ use of information and communication technologies at school and home. British Journal of Educational Technology 40(5), 919–932. doi:10.1111/j.1467–8535.2008.00876.x.
  51. So, H., Choi, H., Lim, W. Y., & Xiong, Y. (2012). Little experience with ICT: Are they really the Net Generation student-teachers? Computers & Education 59(4), 1234–1245.
  52. Stephen, C., Stevenson, O., & Adey, C. (2013). Young children engaging with technologies at home: The influence of family context. Journal of Early Childhood Research 11(2), 149–164.
  53. Valtonen, T., Pontinen, S., Kukkonen, J., Dillon, P., Vaisanen, P., & Hacklin, S. (2011). Confronting the technological pedagogical knowledge of Finnish Net Generation student teachers. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 20(1), 3–18.
  54. Wagner, V., & Acier, D. (2017). Factor structure evaluation of the French version of the Digital Natives Assessment Scale. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 20(3),195–201.
  55. Waycott, J., Bennett, S., Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., & Gray, K. (2010). Digital divides? Student and staff perceptions of information and communication technologies. Computers & Education 54(4), 1202–1211.

سایر مقالات
حریم خصوصی و آسیب‌دیدگی کودکان و نوجوانان ایرانی از شبکه‌های اجتماعی و راهکارهایی برای والدین
یکشنبه, ۰۶ آبان ۱۴۰۳
کلمه سانسور یک معنای دقیق دارد: دفاع از تعدیل محتوا
یکشنبه, ۰۷ بهمن ۱۴۰۳
9 پیش‌بینی در مورد هوش مصنوعی در سال 2021
شنبه, ۲۰ دی ۱۳۹۹
نظریه‌های کلاسیک درباره شکاف جنسیتی دیجیتال چه می‌گویند؟
دوشنبه, ۰۶ مرداد ۱۴۰۴